A Registry-Informed Framework for Earlier Detection of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Thailand: Evidence from a 16-Year Cohort Study

Esophageal cancer is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage, limiting opportunities for curative treatment and contributing to poor clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of advanced-stage presentation and use these findings to inform a registry-informed framework for earlier detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) in Thailand. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Siriraj Cancer Registry. Among 1451 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2009 and 2024, 591 patients with sufficient clinical and/or pathological information for stage assignment were included. Patients were classified as having early-stage (Stage I–II) or advanced-stage (Stage III–IV) disease. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of advanced-stage presentation. Among patients with sufficient information for reliable stage assignment, 77.5% presented with advanced-stage disease. AC histology was independently associated with increased odds of advanced-stage presentation compared with squamous cell carcinoma (adjusted odds ratio 4.16, 95% confidence interval 1.21–14.30; p = 0.024). A trend toward earlier-stage diagnosis was observed during 2017–2024 compared with 2009–2016 (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.43–1.00; p = 0.052). These findings provide hypothesis-generating evidence to inform a risk-based approach to earlier evaluation of individuals at increased risk of esophageal AC in Thailand, which requires prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods and Protocols
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mps9050138
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Registry-Informed Framework for Earlier Detection of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Thailand: Evidence from a 16-Year Cohort Study

Wipanee Meesil, Thanawat Suwatthanarak, Kullanist Thanormjit, Pariyada Tanjak et al.
Methods and Protocols
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

A Registry-Informed Framework for Earlier Detection of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Thailand: Evidence from a 16-Year Cohort Study

Wipanee Meesil, Thanawat Suwatthanarak, Kullanist Thanormjit, Pariyada Tanjak, Kanokporn Thamapala, Thammawat Parakonthun, Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Somsri Laiteerapong, Jirawat Swangsri, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Onchira Acharayothin, Tippawan Gerdsuriwong, Asada Methasate, Arthit Chauykrajang, Patcharipa Chanaturakarnnon, Sripatch Sri-arporn, Thapanee Saejeng
article en

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage, limiting opportunities for curative treatment and contributing to poor clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of advanced-stage presentation and use these findings to inform a registry-informed framework for earlier detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) in Thailand. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Siriraj Cancer Registry. Among 1451 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2009 and 2024, 591 patients with sufficient clinical and/or pathological information for stage assignment were included. Patients were classified as having early-stage (Stage I–II) or advanced-stage (Stage III–IV) disease. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of advanced-stage presentation. Among patients with sufficient information for reliable stage assignment, 77.5% presented with advanced-stage disease. AC histology was independently associated with increased odds of advanced-stage presentation compared with squamous cell carcinoma (adjusted odds ratio 4.16, 95% confidence interval 1.21–14.30; p = 0.024). A trend toward earlier-stage diagnosis was observed during 2017–2024 compared with 2009–2016 (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.43–1.00; p = 0.052). These findings provide hypothesis-generating evidence to inform a risk-based approach to earlier evaluation of individuals at increased risk of esophageal AC in Thailand, which requires prospective validation.

Methods and ProtocolsVol. 9(5)
Siriraj Hospital (TH), Mahidol University (TH)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.