Serum Cystatin 4 combined with routine clinical laboratory indicators: A support vector machine diagnostic model for early screening of gastrointestinal tumors

Gastrointestinal tumors lack non-invasive early screening tools, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages. Serum tumor markers combined with machine learning show promise, but single markers have low specificity. This study aimed to construct a non-invasive diagnostic model using multiple laboratory variables. A retrospective study included 214 gastrointestinal tumor patients (observation group) and 130 non-tumor individuals (control group). Thirty-eight laboratory indicators were detected, and seven core variables (HCT, Age, TP, ALB, PLT, WBC, CST4) were identified via feature selection. Eleven machine learning algorithms were used to build models, with performance evaluated by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, calibration curves, and DCA. Serum CST4 levels were significantly higher in the observation group ( P < 0.001, AUC = 0.706). The SVM model showed the best performance: AUC = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78–0.92), sensitivity = 95.4% (95% CI: 0.87–0.98), specificity = 61.5% (95% CI: 0.52–0.71), PPV = 80.5% (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), NPV = 88.9% (95% CI: 0.81–0.94) in the test set. Calibration curves demonstrated high consistency (deviation < 5%), and DCA confirmed superior net benefits. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified HCT, CST4, and Age as top contributors. This internally validated tool demonstrated promising preliminary performance for gastrointestinal tumor screening in high-risk populations (sensitivity 95.4%, specificity 61.5%). Due to its modest specificity, it is suitable as an auxiliary risk stratification tool for high-risk individuals but not for general population screening. External prospective multi-center validation is mandatory before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353753
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Serum Cystatin 4 combined with routine clinical laboratory indicators: A support vector machine diagnostic model for early screening of gastrointestinal tumors

Lina Yin, Jilu Shen, Huijuan Bi, Wenhao Fang
PLoS ONE
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Serum Cystatin 4 combined with routine clinical laboratory indicators: A support vector machine diagnostic model for early screening of gastrointestinal tumors

Lina Yin, Jilu Shen, Huijuan Bi, Wenhao Fang
article en

Abstract

Gastrointestinal tumors lack non-invasive early screening tools, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages. Serum tumor markers combined with machine learning show promise, but single markers have low specificity. This study aimed to construct a non-invasive diagnostic model using multiple laboratory variables. A retrospective study included 214 gastrointestinal tumor patients (observation group) and 130 non-tumor individuals (control group). Thirty-eight laboratory indicators were detected, and seven core variables (HCT, Age, TP, ALB, PLT, WBC, CST4) were identified via feature selection. Eleven machine learning algorithms were used to build models, with performance evaluated by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, calibration curves, and DCA. Serum CST4 levels were significantly higher in the observation group ( P < 0.001, AUC = 0.706). The SVM model showed the best performance: AUC = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78–0.92), sensitivity = 95.4% (95% CI: 0.87–0.98), specificity = 61.5% (95% CI: 0.52–0.71), PPV = 80.5% (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), NPV = 88.9% (95% CI: 0.81–0.94) in the test set. Calibration curves demonstrated high consistency (deviation < 5%), and DCA confirmed superior net benefits. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified HCT, CST4, and Age as top contributors. This internally validated tool demonstrated promising preliminary performance for gastrointestinal tumor screening in high-risk populations (sensitivity 95.4%, specificity 61.5%). Due to its modest specificity, it is suitable as an auxiliary risk stratification tool for high-risk individuals but not for general population screening. External prospective multi-center validation is mandatory before clinical application.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Anhui Medical University (CN), Anhui Provincial Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.