The Efficacy of Locoregional Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Summary of Background Data: Postoperative pain management in spine surgery remains a significant challenge, often involving general anesthesia (GA) and associated complications. Locoregional anesthesia (LRA) has gained attention for its potential benefits in this context. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of LRA techniques on postoperative pain in patients undergoing spine surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LRA techniques to GA or combined anesthesia methods in adult patients undergoing spine surgery. Studies were evaluated for procedures, interventional techniques, the Visual Analog Scale for low back pain and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index, cumulative analgesic dose, adverse events, and complications. Finally, 2 reviewers assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Results: Twelve RCTs comprising 890 patients (457 in the intervention group and 433 in the comparison group) met the inclusion criteria. LRA techniques were associated with significantly reduced postoperative pain at 24 hours ( MD =−0.45, 95% CI: −0.82 to −0.07; P =0.02). In addition, LRA was associated with lower analgesic consumption ( OR =0.18, 95% CI: 0.11–0.31; P <0.00001) and fewer complications, such as nausea and vomiting ( OR =0.41, 95% CI: 0.18–0.95; P =0.04). However, significant heterogeneity among studies was noted. Conclusion: LRA offers several advantages, including modest but statistically significant differences in pain levels, lower analgesic consumption, and a decreased incidence of complications such as nausea and vomiting compared with GA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000002132
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Efficacy of Locoregional Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery

Vincenzo Denaro, Alessandro Ruggiero, Sabrina Migliorelli, Marta Di Folco et al.
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

The Efficacy of Locoregional Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery

Vincenzo Denaro, Alessandro Ruggiero, Sabrina Migliorelli, Marta Di Folco, Gianluca Vadalà, Giuseppe Pascarella, Massimiliano Carassiti, Rocco Papalia, Alessandro Strumia, Fabrizio Russo, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Summary of Background Data: Postoperative pain management in spine surgery remains a significant challenge, often involving general anesthesia (GA) and associated complications. Locoregional anesthesia (LRA) has gained attention for its potential benefits in this context. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of LRA techniques on postoperative pain in patients undergoing spine surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LRA techniques to GA or combined anesthesia methods in adult patients undergoing spine surgery. Studies were evaluated for procedures, interventional techniques, the Visual Analog Scale for low back pain and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index, cumulative analgesic dose, adverse events, and complications. Finally, 2 reviewers assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Results: Twelve RCTs comprising 890 patients (457 in the intervention group and 433 in the comparison group) met the inclusion criteria. LRA techniques were associated with significantly reduced postoperative pain at 24 hours ( MD =−0.45, 95% CI: −0.82 to −0.07; P =0.02). In addition, LRA was associated with lower analgesic consumption ( OR =0.18, 95% CI: 0.11–0.31; P <0.00001) and fewer complications, such as nausea and vomiting ( OR =0.41, 95% CI: 0.18–0.95; P =0.04). However, significant heterogeneity among studies was noted. Conclusion: LRA offers several advantages, including modest but statistically significant differences in pain levels, lower analgesic consumption, and a decreased incidence of complications such as nausea and vomiting compared with GA.

Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Co-operative College (GB), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.