Utility and best practices for clinical diagnostic testing of the autonomic nervous system: A Consensus Statement Endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Abstract Purpose Disorders of the autonomic nervous system are prevalent and associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and diagnostic delay. Standardized, laboratory-based autonomic function testing provides objective physiological data essential for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring autonomic disorders, yet no current consensus statement establishes best practices for the conduct, interpretation, and minimum quality standards of such testing. Methods The American Autonomic Society convened a writing committee of autonomic specialists to review published evidence and established practices governing standardized autonomic reflex function testing in clinical settings. This consensus statement builds upon prior position statements published by North American and European professional societies. Results We summarize the clinical evidence supporting standardized autonomic reflex function testing across a broad range of conditions, including neurodegenerative disorders, peripheral neuropathies, orthostatic intolerance syndromes, and autoimmune autonomic disorders. We describe the validated battery of tests —orthostatic challenge, Valsalva maneuver, cardiovagal heart rate variability testing, and sudomotor testing—with attention to physiological principles, technical standards, and clinical interpretation. Minimum standards are defined for the requisite roles in autonomic testing: the autonomic technician, supervising clinician, and interpreting autonomic physician. Special considerations for pediatric, pregnant, and critically ill populations are addressed, and emerging adjunctive techniques are reviewed. Conclusion Standardized autonomic reflex function testing is clinically useful, well validated, evidence-based, and non-investigational when performed by qualified personnel adhering to best practices. Autonomic testing is irreplaceable for clinical decision-making in certain circumstances and should be integrated into clinical practice when appropriate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Autonomic Research
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-026-01238-9
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Utility and best practices for clinical diagnostic testing of the autonomic nervous system: A Consensus Statement Endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Nathaniel M. Robbins, Melissa M. Cortez, Amro Maher Stino, Steven A. Vernino et al.
Clinical Autonomic Research
Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
article

Utility and best practices for clinical diagnostic testing of the autonomic nervous system: A Consensus Statement Endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Nathaniel M. Robbins, Melissa M. Cortez, Amro Maher Stino, Steven A. Vernino, David M. Sletten, Glen Cook, Wolfgang Singer, Mitchell G. Miglis, Satish R. Raj
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Disorders of the autonomic nervous system are prevalent and associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and diagnostic delay. Standardized, laboratory-based autonomic function testing provides objective physiological data essential for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring autonomic disorders, yet no current consensus statement establishes best practices for the conduct, interpretation, and minimum quality standards of such testing. Methods The American Autonomic Society convened a writing committee of autonomic specialists to review published evidence and established practices governing standardized autonomic reflex function testing in clinical settings. This consensus statement builds upon prior position statements published by North American and European professional societies. Results We summarize the clinical evidence supporting standardized autonomic reflex function testing across a broad range of conditions, including neurodegenerative disorders, peripheral neuropathies, orthostatic intolerance syndromes, and autoimmune autonomic disorders. We describe the validated battery of tests —orthostatic challenge, Valsalva maneuver, cardiovagal heart rate variability testing, and sudomotor testing—with attention to physiological principles, technical standards, and clinical interpretation. Minimum standards are defined for the requisite roles in autonomic testing: the autonomic technician, supervising clinician, and interpreting autonomic physician. Special considerations for pediatric, pregnant, and critically ill populations are addressed, and emerging adjunctive techniques are reviewed. Conclusion Standardized autonomic reflex function testing is clinically useful, well validated, evidence-based, and non-investigational when performed by qualified personnel adhering to best practices. Autonomic testing is irreplaceable for clinical decision-making in certain circumstances and should be integrated into clinical practice when appropriate.

Clinical Autonomic Research
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (US), Harvard University (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), University of Calgary (CA), University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mass General Brigham (US), Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta (CA), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.