An Evidence-Based Framework for Hardware Security Evaluation Using Side-Channel Analysis: Leakage Detection, Key-Recovery Validation, and Robustness Assessment

Side-channel analysis (SCA) remains a significant threat to embedded cryptographic implementations, yet hardware security evaluation often lacks a systematic workflow that links leakage detection, exploitability validation, trace-efficiency estimation, and robustness assessment. Rather than proposing a new leakage distinguisher, this work presents an evidence-based framework that integrates established SCA techniques into a reproducible hardware security evaluation methodology for embedded AES implementations. The proposed framework follows a structured screen–validate–quantify–stress-test pipeline. Power traces are acquired from an AES-128 implementation on a CW312/SAM4S target using a shunt-based measurement path and firmware-triggered ChipWhisperer–Husky acquisition. Fixed-versus-random test vector leakage assessment (TVLA) using 5000 fixed and 5000 random traces reveals strong first-order leakage, with a dominant peak of |t| = 210.61 at sample index 1916, defining a leakage window of [1666:2167]. Exploitability is validated through timing-aware per-byte correlation power analysis (CPA) under a Hamming-weight leakage model, successfully recovering the full AES-128 key and revealing staggered byte-wise leakage timing for point-of-interest selection. Operational feasibility is quantified through 100 independent subsampling trials over trace budgets M ∈ {25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 700, 1000}, achieving 97% full-key recovery with 25 attack traces and 100% recovery from 50 attack traces onward when using pre-established byte-specific POIs. Independent split-data point-of-interest validation further confirms the stability and reproducibility of the selected leakage locations. Finally, controlled synthetic timing-misalignment experiments evaluate robustness by measuring recovery degradation, weakest-byte confidence behaviour, and the effect of local peak-search compensation under non-ideal analysis conditions. Collectively, this case study demonstrates a reproducible SCA evaluation workflow on the investigated CW312/SAM4S AES-128 implementation, integrating leakage screening, exploitability validation, trace-efficiency analysis, independent POI validation, and controlled robustness testing. The present results establish the workflow on this experimental platform, but evaluation across additional devices, firmware implementations, keys, acquisition sessions, and protected implementations is required before broader generalisation can be claimed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15184324
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

An Evidence-Based Framework for Hardware Security Evaluation Using Side-Channel Analysis: Leakage Detection, Key-Recovery Validation, and Robustness Assessment

Shao-Fang Wen, Arvind Kumar Sharma
Electronics
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
article

An Evidence-Based Framework for Hardware Security Evaluation Using Side-Channel Analysis: Leakage Detection, Key-Recovery Validation, and Robustness Assessment

Shao-Fang Wen, Arvind Kumar Sharma
article en

Abstract

Side-channel analysis (SCA) remains a significant threat to embedded cryptographic implementations, yet hardware security evaluation often lacks a systematic workflow that links leakage detection, exploitability validation, trace-efficiency estimation, and robustness assessment. Rather than proposing a new leakage distinguisher, this work presents an evidence-based framework that integrates established SCA techniques into a reproducible hardware security evaluation methodology for embedded AES implementations. The proposed framework follows a structured screen–validate–quantify–stress-test pipeline. Power traces are acquired from an AES-128 implementation on a CW312/SAM4S target using a shunt-based measurement path and firmware-triggered ChipWhisperer–Husky acquisition. Fixed-versus-random test vector leakage assessment (TVLA) using 5000 fixed and 5000 random traces reveals strong first-order leakage, with a dominant peak of |t| = 210.61 at sample index 1916, defining a leakage window of [1666:2167]. Exploitability is validated through timing-aware per-byte correlation power analysis (CPA) under a Hamming-weight leakage model, successfully recovering the full AES-128 key and revealing staggered byte-wise leakage timing for point-of-interest selection. Operational feasibility is quantified through 100 independent subsampling trials over trace budgets M ∈ {25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 700, 1000}, achieving 97% full-key recovery with 25 attack traces and 100% recovery from 50 attack traces onward when using pre-established byte-specific POIs. Independent split-data point-of-interest validation further confirms the stability and reproducibility of the selected leakage locations. Finally, controlled synthetic timing-misalignment experiments evaluate robustness by measuring recovery degradation, weakest-byte confidence behaviour, and the effect of local peak-search compensation under non-ideal analysis conditions. Collectively, this case study demonstrates a reproducible SCA evaluation workflow on the investigated CW312/SAM4S AES-128 implementation, integrating leakage screening, exploitability validation, trace-efficiency analysis, independent POI validation, and controlled robustness testing. The present results establish the workflow on this experimental platform, but evaluation across additional devices, firmware implementations, keys, acquisition sessions, and protected implementations is required before broader generalisation can be claimed.

ElectronicsVol. 15(18)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.