Isothermal Torrefaction vs. Direct Pyrolysis of Pine Cones: Biochar Texture, Carbon Structure, and Subsequent Electrochemical Evaluation

Pine cones are abundant forestry residues with potential for conversion into carbonaceous materials, yet the influence of torrefaction pretreatment on their particle-size distribution, carbon structure, textural properties, and ash behavior remains insufficiently understood. Here, pine cones were subjected to isothermal torrefaction at 220 °C/120 min or 250 °C/30 min, followed by non-isothermal slow pyrolysis at 500 °C/60 min, and compared with direct pyrolysis. Torrefaction increased fine-particle yield and altered pore development but did not provide an overall textural advantage over direct pyrolysis, demonstrating that improved grindability does not necessarily lead to enhanced biochar textural properties. The directly pyrolyzed biochar was subsequently subjected to H3PO4 activation, resulting in a maximum specific surface area of 561.3 m2 g−1 for the 75–355 µm fraction. Comparative electrochemical testing revealed a particle-size-dependent compromise, with the 63–75 µm fraction providing the highest specific capacitance (34.7 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1), whereas the 75–355 µm fraction exhibited superior rate retention (56.6% at 5 A g−1). Pine cone ash was K-, Ca-, P-, Si-, and Mg-rich, with a low specific surface area (4 m2 g−1). Ash prepared at 720 °C showed lower subsequent mass loss than ash prepared at 650 °C.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14183014
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Isothermal Torrefaction vs. Direct Pyrolysis of Pine Cones: Biochar Texture, Carbon Structure, and Subsequent Electrochemical Evaluation

Ali Umut Șen, Büşra Balcı
Processes
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Isothermal Torrefaction vs. Direct Pyrolysis of Pine Cones: Biochar Texture, Carbon Structure, and Subsequent Electrochemical Evaluation

Ali Umut Șen, Büşra Balcı
article en

Abstract

Pine cones are abundant forestry residues with potential for conversion into carbonaceous materials, yet the influence of torrefaction pretreatment on their particle-size distribution, carbon structure, textural properties, and ash behavior remains insufficiently understood. Here, pine cones were subjected to isothermal torrefaction at 220 °C/120 min or 250 °C/30 min, followed by non-isothermal slow pyrolysis at 500 °C/60 min, and compared with direct pyrolysis. Torrefaction increased fine-particle yield and altered pore development but did not provide an overall textural advantage over direct pyrolysis, demonstrating that improved grindability does not necessarily lead to enhanced biochar textural properties. The directly pyrolyzed biochar was subsequently subjected to H3PO4 activation, resulting in a maximum specific surface area of 561.3 m2 g−1 for the 75–355 µm fraction. Comparative electrochemical testing revealed a particle-size-dependent compromise, with the 63–75 µm fraction providing the highest specific capacitance (34.7 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1), whereas the 75–355 µm fraction exhibited superior rate retention (56.6% at 5 A g−1). Pine cone ash was K-, Ca-, P-, Si-, and Mg-rich, with a low specific surface area (4 m2 g−1). Ash prepared at 720 °C showed lower subsequent mass loss than ash prepared at 650 °C.

ProcessesVol. 14(18)
Izmir Institute of Technology (TR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.