Tourism resilience and recovery in the face of disruptive global events: an international comparison

This study explores tourism recovery and resilience in South Africa following COVID-19 amid geopolitical instability and disruptions to global travel. Using a comparative design, it analyses secondary data from government documents, OECD and UNWTO reports, academic literature, and industry sources across South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Portugal. Four dimensions of resilience are examined: policy response, digital transformation, public-private partnerships, and market diversification. Findings reveal distinct resilience pathways, with Portugal displaying transformative resilience through coherent policies and innovation; Zimbabwe exhibits constrained adaptive resilience due to macroeconomic instability and weak institutional capacity; while South Africa shows systemic yet uneven resilience, supported by a domestic tourism base constrained by structural inequalities and limited digital inclusion. It is argued that South Africa requires

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/33951793
Primary Topic
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Tourism resilience and recovery in the face of disruptive global events: an international comparison

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
article

Tourism resilience and recovery in the face of disruptive global events: an international comparison

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

This study explores tourism recovery and resilience in South Africa following COVID-19 amid geopolitical instability and disruptions to global travel. Using a comparative design, it analyses secondary data from government documents, OECD and UNWTO reports, academic literature, and industry sources across South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Portugal. Four dimensions of resilience are examined: policy response, digital transformation, public-private partnerships, and market diversification. Findings reveal distinct resilience pathways, with Portugal displaying transformative resilience through coherent policies and innovation; Zimbabwe exhibits constrained adaptive resilience due to macroeconomic instability and weak institutional capacity; while South Africa shows systemic yet uneven resilience, supported by a domestic tourism base constrained by structural inequalities and limited digital inclusion. It is argued that South Africa requires

Human Science Research Council SA
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.