Screening strategies for colorectal cancer: adjusting for individual risk factors

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related mortality. While overall incidence has declined, certain populations - particularly younger patients - have experienced a rise. This suggests a more complex risk profile than the dichotomous average vs high risk delineated in guidelines. Risk is currently largely characterized by polyp and family history; however, many additional variables contribute to risk. AREAS COVERED: We synthesize the available data (Pubmed database, focus on article updates in the past 10 years) on non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors for CRC. We explore how these factors could affect screening and surveillance decisions in otherwise average-risk individuals. We then suggest strategies for personalized approaches to CRC screening, explore the role of shared decision making with patients, and highlight future directions for CRC screening. EXPERT OPINION: Our understanding of CRC risk must become increasingly more nuanced to adequately serve, screen, and surveil our patients. Precision medicine offers a pathway to accomplish this, but will require significant research to accurately measure risk, and the ability to adapt risk models as our data evolves. This undertaking grows evermore relevant as medicine becomes increasingly personalized and shared decision making becomes the mainstay of counseling between physicians and patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2026.2737747
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Screening strategies for colorectal cancer: adjusting for individual risk factors

Sophie Montgomery, Joseph D. Feuerstein, Kelsey L. Anderson, Ashlee Winslow
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Screening strategies for colorectal cancer: adjusting for individual risk factors

Sophie Montgomery, Joseph D. Feuerstein, Kelsey L. Anderson, Ashlee Winslow
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related mortality. While overall incidence has declined, certain populations - particularly younger patients - have experienced a rise. This suggests a more complex risk profile than the dichotomous average vs high risk delineated in guidelines. Risk is currently largely characterized by polyp and family history; however, many additional variables contribute to risk. AREAS COVERED: We synthesize the available data (Pubmed database, focus on article updates in the past 10 years) on non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors for CRC. We explore how these factors could affect screening and surveillance decisions in otherwise average-risk individuals. We then suggest strategies for personalized approaches to CRC screening, explore the role of shared decision making with patients, and highlight future directions for CRC screening. EXPERT OPINION: Our understanding of CRC risk must become increasingly more nuanced to adequately serve, screen, and surveil our patients. Precision medicine offers a pathway to accomplish this, but will require significant research to accurately measure risk, and the ability to adapt risk models as our data evolves. This undertaking grows evermore relevant as medicine becomes increasingly personalized and shared decision making becomes the mainstay of counseling between physicians and patients.

Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Hadassah Medical Center (IL), Deaconess Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.