Granular flexible recycling of semi-rigid base asphalt pavements using foamed and emulsified asphalt

The rehabilitation of semi-rigid base asphalt pavements generates both reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) from the surface layer and reclaimed inorganic-binder-stabilized material from the base layer. This study investigated a granular flexible recycling approach using foamed asphalt and emulsified asphalt for two practical scenarios: recycling of surface-layer RAP and composite recycling of surface RAP with reclaimed semi-rigid base material. Binder preparation, gradation reconstruction, optimum water content, recycling-binder content and cement-assisted mixture design were followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), unconfined compressive strength, compressive resilient modulus, indirect tensile strength (ITS), moisture resistance and dynamic modulus/master-curve evaluation. Type-I 70# asphalt showed the best foaming performance at 160 °C and 3.0% foaming water, with an expansion ratio of 17.8 and a half-life of 14 s. The selected emulsified asphalt was prepared using 95 °C water, 150 °C asphalt, 1.5 min emulsification, 1.5% Type-A emulsifier, 62% asphalt content, 2% stabilizer and pH 2. The optimum foamed asphalt content was 3.0% for both reclaimed-material systems, whereas the optimum emulsified asphalt contents were 4.5% and 4.0% for the surface-layer and surface-base systems, respectively. The optimized mixtures achieved dry ITS values of 0.57–0.63 MPa and wet/dry strength ratios of 90.6–94.2%, exceeding the JTG/T 5521–2019 base-layer design thresholds of 0.50 MPa and 80% for heavy-and-above traffic. At 20 °C and 10 Hz, the EACR systems exhibited higher dynamic modulus, whereas the FACR systems exhibited higher compressive and dry tensile strength under the tested curing condition. Because Type-I 70# asphalt was used for FACR and Type-I 90# asphalt was used for EACR, these differences are interpreted as system-level differences rather than effects attributable solely to recycling-binder form. The results support laboratory-scale applicability of the optimized mixtures as recycled flexible base or lower structural layers; low-temperature cracking and rutting resistance require further verification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.148263
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Granular flexible recycling of semi-rigid base asphalt pavements using foamed and emulsified asphalt

Lei Lyu, Liting Yu, Abuduwaili Reheman, Rui Li et al.
Construction and Building Materials
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Granular flexible recycling of semi-rigid base asphalt pavements using foamed and emulsified asphalt

Lei Lyu, Liting Yu, Abuduwaili Reheman, Rui Li, Donliang Hu, Jianzhong Pei
article en

Abstract

The rehabilitation of semi-rigid base asphalt pavements generates both reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) from the surface layer and reclaimed inorganic-binder-stabilized material from the base layer. This study investigated a granular flexible recycling approach using foamed asphalt and emulsified asphalt for two practical scenarios: recycling of surface-layer RAP and composite recycling of surface RAP with reclaimed semi-rigid base material. Binder preparation, gradation reconstruction, optimum water content, recycling-binder content and cement-assisted mixture design were followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), unconfined compressive strength, compressive resilient modulus, indirect tensile strength (ITS), moisture resistance and dynamic modulus/master-curve evaluation. Type-I 70# asphalt showed the best foaming performance at 160 °C and 3.0% foaming water, with an expansion ratio of 17.8 and a half-life of 14 s. The selected emulsified asphalt was prepared using 95 °C water, 150 °C asphalt, 1.5 min emulsification, 1.5% Type-A emulsifier, 62% asphalt content, 2% stabilizer and pH 2. The optimum foamed asphalt content was 3.0% for both reclaimed-material systems, whereas the optimum emulsified asphalt contents were 4.5% and 4.0% for the surface-layer and surface-base systems, respectively. The optimized mixtures achieved dry ITS values of 0.57–0.63 MPa and wet/dry strength ratios of 90.6–94.2%, exceeding the JTG/T 5521–2019 base-layer design thresholds of 0.50 MPa and 80% for heavy-and-above traffic. At 20 °C and 10 Hz, the EACR systems exhibited higher dynamic modulus, whereas the FACR systems exhibited higher compressive and dry tensile strength under the tested curing condition. Because Type-I 70# asphalt was used for FACR and Type-I 90# asphalt was used for EACR, these differences are interpreted as system-level differences rather than effects attributable solely to recycling-binder form. The results support laboratory-scale applicability of the optimized mixtures as recycled flexible base or lower structural layers; low-temperature cracking and rutting resistance require further verification.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 543
Chang'an University (CN), Xinjiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.