About the influence of the use of geometric altimetry on cruise flight efficiency under nominal operations

Abstract The introduction of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) generally enables the use of the geometric altitude for altimetry instead of the currently used barometric altitudes, which is indeed a simple and robust method for altimetry but is also subject to various measurement errors. By using geometric instead of barometric altimetry, a more efficient airspace design is be expected. However, the use of geometric altimetry also influences the aircraft performance, which generally follows barometric relations. A fast-time simulation study was performed to investigate the influence of the use of geometric altimetry instead of barometric altimetry on cruise flight efficiency. A series of more than 600 real scheduled flights was analysed and re-simulated applying geometric altimetry in order to determine the fuel consumption in the theoretical event that the respective flight had been conducted with geometric instead of the actual barometric altimetry. Furthermore, factors such as the risk to exceed the maximum barometric altitude and the influence on flight time were analysed. The simulations revealed that, on average, the flights would have consumed more fuel in cruise flight with geometric altimetry than with barometric altimetry. Also, a considerable risk to exceed the maximum barometric altitude was found. This would require additional step descents in order to prevent the exceeding of the maximum altitude. Although some assumptions had to be taken (e.g. on the aircraft take-off mass), the study is designed as a comparison study, so that systematic mistakes through wrong assumptions can be neglected as they cancel each other out throught the comparison of the same flight with barometric and geometric altimetry. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the introduction of geometric altimetry in cruise flight would affect flight efficiency negatively and would probably lead to more level changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-01008-3
Primary Topic
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

About the influence of the use of geometric altimetry on cruise flight efficiency under nominal operations

Dennis Vechtel
CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
article

About the influence of the use of geometric altimetry on cruise flight efficiency under nominal operations

Dennis Vechtel
article en

Abstract

Abstract The introduction of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) generally enables the use of the geometric altitude for altimetry instead of the currently used barometric altitudes, which is indeed a simple and robust method for altimetry but is also subject to various measurement errors. By using geometric instead of barometric altimetry, a more efficient airspace design is be expected. However, the use of geometric altimetry also influences the aircraft performance, which generally follows barometric relations. A fast-time simulation study was performed to investigate the influence of the use of geometric altimetry instead of barometric altimetry on cruise flight efficiency. A series of more than 600 real scheduled flights was analysed and re-simulated applying geometric altimetry in order to determine the fuel consumption in the theoretical event that the respective flight had been conducted with geometric instead of the actual barometric altimetry. Furthermore, factors such as the risk to exceed the maximum barometric altitude and the influence on flight time were analysed. The simulations revealed that, on average, the flights would have consumed more fuel in cruise flight with geometric altimetry than with barometric altimetry. Also, a considerable risk to exceed the maximum barometric altitude was found. This would require additional step descents in order to prevent the exceeding of the maximum altitude. Although some assumptions had to be taken (e.g. on the aircraft take-off mass), the study is designed as a comparison study, so that systematic mistakes through wrong assumptions can be neglected as they cancel each other out throught the comparison of the same flight with barometric and geometric altimetry. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the introduction of geometric altimetry in cruise flight would affect flight efficiency negatively and would probably lead to more level changes.

CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Government of the United Kingdom, UK Research and Innovation, European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.