Comparative analysis of tree leaves and paper shading materials on solar photovoltaic performance in Makindye, Uganda

Shading is a major factor affecting the reliability and efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems, particularly in tropical urban areas where incident solar radiation is frequently blocked by trees, buildings, leaves, and paper litter due to moving wind. This study examined the effects of paper shade and Ficus lyrata leaves on the electrical performance of a 40 W monocrystalline solar panel in Kansanga, Makindye Division, and Kampala, Uganda. As part of an experimental design, the panel was exposed to unshaded conditions as well as one, two, and three layer shading configurations using paper and leaves. Solar radiation, ambient temperature, cell temperature, voltage, current, power output, and panel efficiency were also calculated. The experiment was conducted between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. for 80 days. The effects of shading intensity and material type on panel performance were assessed using descriptive statistics, regression, correlation, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The average voltage (24.85 V), current (1.22 A), power production (30.24 W), and efficiency (12.61%) were all highest on the unshaded panel. The average power output dropped from 15.28 W to 7.45 W and efficiency from 5.70% to 2.90% under leaf shadowing, while the average current fell from 0.64 A for one leaf layer to 0.32 A for three layers. More significant performance losses were caused by paper shading, which decreased the average current from 0.43 A to 0.21 A, the power output from 10.35 W to 4.80 W, and the efficiency from 4.21% to 1.88%. Paper shaded conditions showed a stronger correlations (r = 0.63) than leaf-shaded situations (r = 0.58), according to correlation analysis. According to regression analysis, leaf shading explained only 9.1% of the difference in panel efficiency (R 2 = 0.09, p = 0.06), but paper shading explained 35.3% (R 2 = 0.35, p < 0.001). Similarly, 14.4% and 12.8% of the difference in power output were explained by shading by paper and leaves, respectively. The results show that shading dramatically lowers solar performance, and because paper has a lower light transmittance than leaves, it causes more electrical losses. In order to improve solar energy output in tropical areas, the study emphasizes the significance of appropriate panel positioning, regular cleaning, and plant control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Energy
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43937-026-00186-9
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative analysis of tree leaves and paper shading materials on solar photovoltaic performance in Makindye, Uganda

Afam Uzorka, Muhamad Mustafa Mundu, Living Ounyesiga, Jagulaine Peter et al.
Discover Energy
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Comparative analysis of tree leaves and paper shading materials on solar photovoltaic performance in Makindye, Uganda

Afam Uzorka, Muhamad Mustafa Mundu, Living Ounyesiga, Jagulaine Peter, Atukwase Judith, Matsiko Baron
article en

Abstract

Shading is a major factor affecting the reliability and efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems, particularly in tropical urban areas where incident solar radiation is frequently blocked by trees, buildings, leaves, and paper litter due to moving wind. This study examined the effects of paper shade and Ficus lyrata leaves on the electrical performance of a 40 W monocrystalline solar panel in Kansanga, Makindye Division, and Kampala, Uganda. As part of an experimental design, the panel was exposed to unshaded conditions as well as one, two, and three layer shading configurations using paper and leaves. Solar radiation, ambient temperature, cell temperature, voltage, current, power output, and panel efficiency were also calculated. The experiment was conducted between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. for 80 days. The effects of shading intensity and material type on panel performance were assessed using descriptive statistics, regression, correlation, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The average voltage (24.85 V), current (1.22 A), power production (30.24 W), and efficiency (12.61%) were all highest on the unshaded panel. The average power output dropped from 15.28 W to 7.45 W and efficiency from 5.70% to 2.90% under leaf shadowing, while the average current fell from 0.64 A for one leaf layer to 0.32 A for three layers. More significant performance losses were caused by paper shading, which decreased the average current from 0.43 A to 0.21 A, the power output from 10.35 W to 4.80 W, and the efficiency from 4.21% to 1.88%. Paper shaded conditions showed a stronger correlations (r = 0.63) than leaf-shaded situations (r = 0.58), according to correlation analysis. According to regression analysis, leaf shading explained only 9.1% of the difference in panel efficiency (R 2 = 0.09, p = 0.06), but paper shading explained 35.3% (R 2 = 0.35, p < 0.001). Similarly, 14.4% and 12.8% of the difference in power output were explained by shading by paper and leaves, respectively. The results show that shading dramatically lowers solar performance, and because paper has a lower light transmittance than leaves, it causes more electrical losses. In order to improve solar energy output in tropical areas, the study emphasizes the significance of appropriate panel positioning, regular cleaning, and plant control.

Discover EnergyVol. 6(1)
Kampala International University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.