Acceptability and preference of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus DNA testing compared with physician-collected Pap smear

BACKGROUND: Self-collected vaginal sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing provides a promising alternative to physician-collected Pap smears, especially in low-resource settings. However, data on its acceptability and preferences among Filipino women remain limited. This study aimed to assess women's perceptions, experiences, willingness and preferences regarding self-collected vaginal sampling for HPV DNA testing compared with Pap smears. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 592 women. Participants underwent both physician-collected Pap smears and self-collected vaginal sampling for HPV DNA testing. Perceptions were measured using five-point Likert scale questionnaires before and after self-collection. Descriptive statistics were used, and paired and independent Wilcoxon tests were used to compare Likert responses. Willingness to undergo screening was analyzed with Cochran's Q and McNemar tests. Participants' reasons for their preferred screening method were categorized thematically and displayed in stacked bar charts. RESULTS: Self-collection was generally viewed as painless, not uncomfortable, non-embarrassing, and easy and convenient. Acceptability significantly increased after participants performed self-collection (P < 0.001 for pain and discomfort). Compared with Pap smears, self-collection was seen as less embarrassing (P < 0.001), but rated as less easy (P = 0.01) and less convenient (P = 0.004). Most participants preferred physician-administered screening (84.8%) due to trust in medical expertise, and confidence in the procedure's accuracy, safety and cleanliness. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collected vaginal sampling was highly acceptable, yet physician-collected screening remained the preferred method. Improving education, demonstrations, and support for self-collection may enhance the uptake of HPV DNA testing and broaden access to cervical cancer screening in the Philippines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual Health
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/sh26069
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Acceptability and preference of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus DNA testing compared with physician-collected Pap smear

Ourlad Alzeus G. Tantengco, Sheriah Laine M. de Paz‐Silava, Ian Kim B. Tabios, Amina C Kunting et al.
Sexual Health
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Acceptability and preference of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus DNA testing compared with physician-collected Pap smear

Ourlad Alzeus G. Tantengco, Sheriah Laine M. de Paz‐Silava, Ian Kim B. Tabios, Amina C Kunting, MD Michele H. Diwa, Mikayla Francesca N. de Guzman
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-collected vaginal sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing provides a promising alternative to physician-collected Pap smears, especially in low-resource settings. However, data on its acceptability and preferences among Filipino women remain limited. This study aimed to assess women's perceptions, experiences, willingness and preferences regarding self-collected vaginal sampling for HPV DNA testing compared with Pap smears. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 592 women. Participants underwent both physician-collected Pap smears and self-collected vaginal sampling for HPV DNA testing. Perceptions were measured using five-point Likert scale questionnaires before and after self-collection. Descriptive statistics were used, and paired and independent Wilcoxon tests were used to compare Likert responses. Willingness to undergo screening was analyzed with Cochran's Q and McNemar tests. Participants' reasons for their preferred screening method were categorized thematically and displayed in stacked bar charts. RESULTS: Self-collection was generally viewed as painless, not uncomfortable, non-embarrassing, and easy and convenient. Acceptability significantly increased after participants performed self-collection (P < 0.001 for pain and discomfort). Compared with Pap smears, self-collection was seen as less embarrassing (P < 0.001), but rated as less easy (P = 0.01) and less convenient (P = 0.004). Most participants preferred physician-administered screening (84.8%) due to trust in medical expertise, and confidence in the procedure's accuracy, safety and cleanliness. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collected vaginal sampling was highly acceptable, yet physician-collected screening remained the preferred method. Improving education, demonstrations, and support for self-collection may enhance the uptake of HPV DNA testing and broaden access to cervical cancer screening in the Philippines.

Sexual HealthVol. 23(5)
University of the Philippines System (PH), Philippine Medical Association (PH), Philippine Heart Center (PH), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), University of the Philippines Manila (PH), University of the Philippines Diliman (PH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.