Effect of dentin conditioners on biomarker release and microhardness of radicular dentin: an in vitro study

AIM: This study investigated the effects of various radicular dentin conditioning agents, maleic acid, citric acid, phosphoric acid, and EDTA, on dentin-derived biomarker release and radicular dentin microhardness for regenerative endodontic applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted teeth were processed into dentin cylinders and discs and randomly assigned to five groups (n = 12): 7% maleic acid, 10% citric acid, 37% phosphoric acid, 17% EDTA, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a negative control. Growth factor release (TGF-β, VEGF, BMP-2) was quantified using ELISA after 24 h incubation. Microhardness changes were evaluated in corresponding dentin cylinders sectioned longitudinally. RESULTS: Maleic acid produced the highest release of TGF-β, VEGF, and BMP-2 (p < 0.001), followed by EDTA, citric acid, and phosphoric acid in a biomarker-dependent hierarchy. Microhardness was significantly affected by the conditioning agent (p = 0.004), with EDTA and maleic acid reducing dentin hardness compared with the control, while citric acid and phosphoric acid showed no significant effect. No significant differences were observed among root thirds (p = 0.169). CONCLUSION: Dentin conditioning in regenerative endodontics involves a trade-off between biological activation and preservation of structural integrity. Stronger conditioning agents enhance growth factor release but may compromise dentin hardness. Among the tested agents, citric acid demonstrated the most balanced performance, combining effective biomarker release with minimal effects on dentin microhardness. In contrast, phosphoric acid preserved dentin structure but showed limited biological activity, making it less suitable when regenerative signaling is the primary objective. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The selection of dentin conditioning agents should not be based solely on their biological signaling potential, as it directly influences the mechanical properties of radicular dentin and may impact regenerative outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09318-y
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effect of dentin conditioners on biomarker release and microhardness of radicular dentin: an in vitro study

Maii Youssef Elmesellawy, Mona Abdel Rehim Wahby, Ahmed Hussein Abuelezz
BMC Oral Health
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Effect of dentin conditioners on biomarker release and microhardness of radicular dentin: an in vitro study

Maii Youssef Elmesellawy, Mona Abdel Rehim Wahby, Ahmed Hussein Abuelezz
article en

Abstract

AIM: This study investigated the effects of various radicular dentin conditioning agents, maleic acid, citric acid, phosphoric acid, and EDTA, on dentin-derived biomarker release and radicular dentin microhardness for regenerative endodontic applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted teeth were processed into dentin cylinders and discs and randomly assigned to five groups (n = 12): 7% maleic acid, 10% citric acid, 37% phosphoric acid, 17% EDTA, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a negative control. Growth factor release (TGF-β, VEGF, BMP-2) was quantified using ELISA after 24 h incubation. Microhardness changes were evaluated in corresponding dentin cylinders sectioned longitudinally. RESULTS: Maleic acid produced the highest release of TGF-β, VEGF, and BMP-2 (p < 0.001), followed by EDTA, citric acid, and phosphoric acid in a biomarker-dependent hierarchy. Microhardness was significantly affected by the conditioning agent (p = 0.004), with EDTA and maleic acid reducing dentin hardness compared with the control, while citric acid and phosphoric acid showed no significant effect. No significant differences were observed among root thirds (p = 0.169). CONCLUSION: Dentin conditioning in regenerative endodontics involves a trade-off between biological activation and preservation of structural integrity. Stronger conditioning agents enhance growth factor release but may compromise dentin hardness. Among the tested agents, citric acid demonstrated the most balanced performance, combining effective biomarker release with minimal effects on dentin microhardness. In contrast, phosphoric acid preserved dentin structure but showed limited biological activity, making it less suitable when regenerative signaling is the primary objective. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The selection of dentin conditioning agents should not be based solely on their biological signaling potential, as it directly influences the mechanical properties of radicular dentin and may impact regenerative outcomes.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Beni-Suef University (EG), Suez University (EG), Misr International University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.