Optimized tubeless strategy: combined pre-stenting and omission of postoperative ureteral stent reduces systemic inflammation and complications after flexible ureteroscopy for middle-upper calyceal stones

To evaluate the clinical and inflammatory outcomes of an optimized “pre-stented tubeless” strategy (preoperative stent placement followed by stent omission after surgery) compared to conventional stenting approaches in patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for middle-upper calyceal stones. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (preoperative double-J stent placement for 2 weeks, followed by tubeless FURS without postoperative stenting), Group B (preoperative double-J stent placement for 2 weeks, followed by FURS with postoperative double-J stent retention), and Group C (no preoperative stenting, direct FURS with postoperative double-J stent placement).The inflammatory factors and clinical outcomes among the 3 groups are compared. There is a significant difference in operation time among the 3 groups, and group A has the shortest time ( P < 0.05). There have been no significant differences in stone clearance rate ( P > 0.05). Additionally, it is observed that the incidence of postoperative hematuria and bladder irritation in group A has been comparatively lower than those in groups B and C ( P < 0.01). At the same time, 24 h after the operation, among the 3 groups, the incidence of fever between groups A and B was considerably lower than that of group C ( P < 0.05). Lastly, CRP and WBC in groups A and B were lower than those in group C after the operation, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). For patients with middle-upper calyceal stones, the combined strategy of preoperative stent placement and postoperative stent omission significantly reduces operative time and stent-related complications (hematuria, bladder irritation) without compromising stone clearance. Crucially, this strategy is associated with a significantly attenuated systemic inflammatory response (lower CRP and WBC) compared to primary FURS with postoperative stenting, demonstrating its feasibility and potential physiological benefits beyond current guideline recommendations. Randomized controlled trial MR-37-22-010550.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Urology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02359-z
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Optimized tubeless strategy: combined pre-stenting and omission of postoperative ureteral stent reduces systemic inflammation and complications after flexible ureteroscopy for middle-upper calyceal stones

Shiping Wang, Chaofan Wen, Zhenpeng Zhou
BMC Urology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Optimized tubeless strategy: combined pre-stenting and omission of postoperative ureteral stent reduces systemic inflammation and complications after flexible ureteroscopy for middle-upper calyceal stones

Shiping Wang, Chaofan Wen, Zhenpeng Zhou
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical and inflammatory outcomes of an optimized “pre-stented tubeless” strategy (preoperative stent placement followed by stent omission after surgery) compared to conventional stenting approaches in patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for middle-upper calyceal stones. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (preoperative double-J stent placement for 2 weeks, followed by tubeless FURS without postoperative stenting), Group B (preoperative double-J stent placement for 2 weeks, followed by FURS with postoperative double-J stent retention), and Group C (no preoperative stenting, direct FURS with postoperative double-J stent placement).The inflammatory factors and clinical outcomes among the 3 groups are compared. There is a significant difference in operation time among the 3 groups, and group A has the shortest time ( P < 0.05). There have been no significant differences in stone clearance rate ( P > 0.05). Additionally, it is observed that the incidence of postoperative hematuria and bladder irritation in group A has been comparatively lower than those in groups B and C ( P < 0.01). At the same time, 24 h after the operation, among the 3 groups, the incidence of fever between groups A and B was considerably lower than that of group C ( P < 0.05). Lastly, CRP and WBC in groups A and B were lower than those in group C after the operation, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). For patients with middle-upper calyceal stones, the combined strategy of preoperative stent placement and postoperative stent omission significantly reduces operative time and stent-related complications (hematuria, bladder irritation) without compromising stone clearance. Crucially, this strategy is associated with a significantly attenuated systemic inflammatory response (lower CRP and WBC) compared to primary FURS with postoperative stenting, demonstrating its feasibility and potential physiological benefits beyond current guideline recommendations. Randomized controlled trial MR-37-22-010550.

BMC Urology
Shandong Provincial Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.