ABO Blood Group Mismatch in Heart Transplantation Is Not Associated With Elevated Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a reliable, noninvasive marker for detecting allograft rejection after heart transplantation (HT). We evaluated whether dd-cfDNA levels differ in recipients of ABO-compatible, nonidentical (mismatched) grafts. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of 219 adult HT recipients transplanted between January 2019 and May 2023, each with at least one dd-cfDNA sample collected between November 2019 and April 2024. ABO mismatch was defined as a donor blood type A, B, or AB that was compatible with but nonidentical to the recipient's type; only ABO-compatible transplants were included. dd-cfDNA was measured using a commercially available assay (AlloSure, CareDx, Brisbane, CA), and a level ≥0.20% was defined as positive. A total of 1,783 dd-cfDNA tests were analyzed, with a 16.0% overall positivity rate. Positivity was 20.1% in the mismatched group and 15.5% in the matched group, with no statistically significant difference whether dd-cfDNA was treated as a binary (p = 0.95) or continuous (p = 0.26) variable. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in gene expression profiling, donor-specific antibodies, rejection, or survival. In this adult cohort, ABO-compatible nonidentical HT was not associated with higher dd-cfDNA levels, although the small mismatched subgroup limits statistical power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002813
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

ABO Blood Group Mismatch in Heart Transplantation Is Not Associated With Elevated Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA

Cathrine M. Moeller, J. Fried, Nir Y. Uriel, Kevin J. Clerkin et al.
ASAIO Journal
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

ABO Blood Group Mismatch in Heart Transplantation Is Not Associated With Elevated Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA

Cathrine M. Moeller, J. Fried, Nir Y. Uriel, Kevin J. Clerkin, Boris Fishman, Dor Lotan, Julia Baranowska, Farhana Latif, Carolyn Hennecken, Daniel Oren, Ilan Richter, David T. Majure, Andrea Fernández-Valledor, Adi Hertz, Jayant Raikhelkar, Adil Yunis, Gabriel T. Sayer, Koji Takeda, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Ersilia M. Defilippis
article en

Abstract

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a reliable, noninvasive marker for detecting allograft rejection after heart transplantation (HT). We evaluated whether dd-cfDNA levels differ in recipients of ABO-compatible, nonidentical (mismatched) grafts. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of 219 adult HT recipients transplanted between January 2019 and May 2023, each with at least one dd-cfDNA sample collected between November 2019 and April 2024. ABO mismatch was defined as a donor blood type A, B, or AB that was compatible with but nonidentical to the recipient's type; only ABO-compatible transplants were included. dd-cfDNA was measured using a commercially available assay (AlloSure, CareDx, Brisbane, CA), and a level ≥0.20% was defined as positive. A total of 1,783 dd-cfDNA tests were analyzed, with a 16.0% overall positivity rate. Positivity was 20.1% in the mismatched group and 15.5% in the matched group, with no statistically significant difference whether dd-cfDNA was treated as a binary (p = 0.95) or continuous (p = 0.26) variable. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in gene expression profiling, donor-specific antibodies, rejection, or survival. In this adult cohort, ABO-compatible nonidentical HT was not associated with higher dd-cfDNA levels, although the small mismatched subgroup limits statistical power.

ASAIO Journal
Cornell University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.