Robotic versus laparoscopic anti-reflux and hiatal surgery in a uk benign upper gi unit: perioperative outcomes in a four-year observational study

Abstract Robotic fundoplication is rapidly expanding across the UK, however, robust comparative data from routine benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) practice remain limited. This study compares perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic fundoplication within a UK benign UGI unit. This retrospective observational study included consecutive adults undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic anti-reflux or hiatal surgery between February 2022 and January 2026. The primary outcome was total operative time. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, same-day discharge, complications, 30-day readmission, 30-day return to theatre, subsequent redofundoplication and early clinically recorded recurrence. One hundred patients were included: 57 robotic and 43 laparoscopic. Revisional surgery was more frequent robotically (33.3% versus 11.6%; p = 0.006). Overall, robotic procedures had shorter median operative times (88 versus 120 min; p = 0.017) and higher same-day discharge rates (63.2% versus 27.9%). After excluding the highest-volume robotic surgeon, median robotic operative time remained 27 min shorter than laparoscopy (93 versus 120 min), although the difference was no longer statistically significant ( p = 0.16). Among 76 primary operations, robotics was associated with shorter unadjusted operative time (77 versus 120 min; p < 0.001), shorter length of stay (0 versus 1 day; p = 0.003) and higher same-day discharge (60.5% versus 23.7%; OR 4.94, 95% CI 1.83–13.31; p = 0.002). Following covariate adjustment, operative time remained an estimated 11% shorter robotically, although the confidence interval included no difference (time ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.72–1.09; p = 0.250). The association with same-day discharge persisted after adjustment (OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.09–23.00; p = 0.038). Robotic anti-reflux and hiatal surgery was successfully integrated into an established benign UGI service, including for a substantial revisional workload. Favourable operative times and same-day discharge rates demonstrate the potential for efficient service delivery, although the respective contributions of platform, surgeon expertise, case selection and treatment era cannot be separated. These findings demonstrate feasibility and support further prospective evaluation of its comparative clinical and economic value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03988-0
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic anti-reflux and hiatal surgery in a uk benign upper gi unit: perioperative outcomes in a four-year observational study

Sadiq Bawa, Edward John Nevins, Alexander Green, Jada Saunders et al.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic anti-reflux and hiatal surgery in a uk benign upper gi unit: perioperative outcomes in a four-year observational study

Sadiq Bawa, Edward John Nevins, Alexander Green, Jada Saunders, Liam Horgan, Mustafa Al-Qasem
article en

Abstract

Abstract Robotic fundoplication is rapidly expanding across the UK, however, robust comparative data from routine benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) practice remain limited. This study compares perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic fundoplication within a UK benign UGI unit. This retrospective observational study included consecutive adults undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic anti-reflux or hiatal surgery between February 2022 and January 2026. The primary outcome was total operative time. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, same-day discharge, complications, 30-day readmission, 30-day return to theatre, subsequent redofundoplication and early clinically recorded recurrence. One hundred patients were included: 57 robotic and 43 laparoscopic. Revisional surgery was more frequent robotically (33.3% versus 11.6%; p = 0.006). Overall, robotic procedures had shorter median operative times (88 versus 120 min; p = 0.017) and higher same-day discharge rates (63.2% versus 27.9%). After excluding the highest-volume robotic surgeon, median robotic operative time remained 27 min shorter than laparoscopy (93 versus 120 min), although the difference was no longer statistically significant ( p = 0.16). Among 76 primary operations, robotics was associated with shorter unadjusted operative time (77 versus 120 min; p < 0.001), shorter length of stay (0 versus 1 day; p = 0.003) and higher same-day discharge (60.5% versus 23.7%; OR 4.94, 95% CI 1.83–13.31; p = 0.002). Following covariate adjustment, operative time remained an estimated 11% shorter robotically, although the confidence interval included no difference (time ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.72–1.09; p = 0.250). The association with same-day discharge persisted after adjustment (OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.09–23.00; p = 0.038). Robotic anti-reflux and hiatal surgery was successfully integrated into an established benign UGI service, including for a substantial revisional workload. Favourable operative times and same-day discharge rates demonstrate the potential for efficient service delivery, although the respective contributions of platform, surgeon expertise, case selection and treatment era cannot be separated. These findings demonstrate feasibility and support further prospective evaluation of its comparative clinical and economic value.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.