Triglycerides and gestational diabetes mellitus: integrated clinical and genetic evidence linking LPL-related lipid metabolism

Abstract Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse maternal and offspring outcomes, and disturbances in lipid metabolism may contribute to its metabolic pathophysiology. Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels have been consistently associated with GDM; however, it remains unclear whether this association is independent of correlated lipid traits and which genetic pathways may link TG metabolism to GDM. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis in 2,735 Chinese pregnant women, including 380 with GDM. Lipid traits were measured at 24–28 gestational weeks, when GDM was diagnosed by 75-g oral glucose tolerance testing. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines assessed clinical associations. Two-sample and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) using female-specific genome-wide association data, expression quantitative trait locus analyses, summary-data-based MR, and colocalization were used to examine genetically predicted TG, LPL expression, and GDM. Cross-ancestry analyses were performed in East Asian populations. Results TG showed the most consistent positive association with GDM; each 1 mmol/L increase was associated with 24% higher odds of GDM (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.33). Genetic analyses supported an association between genetically predicted TG and GDM. This association persisted in the primary multivariable MR models but was attenuated in the exploratory fully adjusted lipid model. Higher genetically proxied LPL expression was associated with lower GDM risk. Colocalization showed moderate evidence of a shared TG-GDM signal at the LPL locus (PP.H4 = 0.688), with consistent results across genomic windows, whereas blood-derived LPL cis-eQTL signals did not clearly colocalize with GDM. East Asian analyses were not statistically significant, although ancestry-specific estimates did not differ significantly. Conclusions TG-related lipid dysregulation was consistently associated with GDM, and complementary genetic analyses support LPL-related metabolism as a biologically plausible candidate pathway. However, the available data do not confirm that this association is mediated through genetically regulated LPL expression in blood. Larger prospective and ancestry-specific pregnancy studies integrating pregnancy-relevant molecular data are warranted to clarify temporality and tissue-specific mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lipids in Health and Disease
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-026-03043-9
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Triglycerides and gestational diabetes mellitus: integrated clinical and genetic evidence linking LPL-related lipid metabolism

Fanzhen Hong, Juanyu Ma, Wenjuan Sun, Lihua Dong et al.
Lipids in Health and Disease
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Triglycerides and gestational diabetes mellitus: integrated clinical and genetic evidence linking LPL-related lipid metabolism

Fanzhen Hong, Juanyu Ma, Wenjuan Sun, Lihua Dong, Yao Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse maternal and offspring outcomes, and disturbances in lipid metabolism may contribute to its metabolic pathophysiology. Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels have been consistently associated with GDM; however, it remains unclear whether this association is independent of correlated lipid traits and which genetic pathways may link TG metabolism to GDM. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis in 2,735 Chinese pregnant women, including 380 with GDM. Lipid traits were measured at 24–28 gestational weeks, when GDM was diagnosed by 75-g oral glucose tolerance testing. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines assessed clinical associations. Two-sample and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) using female-specific genome-wide association data, expression quantitative trait locus analyses, summary-data-based MR, and colocalization were used to examine genetically predicted TG, LPL expression, and GDM. Cross-ancestry analyses were performed in East Asian populations. Results TG showed the most consistent positive association with GDM; each 1 mmol/L increase was associated with 24% higher odds of GDM (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.33). Genetic analyses supported an association between genetically predicted TG and GDM. This association persisted in the primary multivariable MR models but was attenuated in the exploratory fully adjusted lipid model. Higher genetically proxied LPL expression was associated with lower GDM risk. Colocalization showed moderate evidence of a shared TG-GDM signal at the LPL locus (PP.H4 = 0.688), with consistent results across genomic windows, whereas blood-derived LPL cis-eQTL signals did not clearly colocalize with GDM. East Asian analyses were not statistically significant, although ancestry-specific estimates did not differ significantly. Conclusions TG-related lipid dysregulation was consistently associated with GDM, and complementary genetic analyses support LPL-related metabolism as a biologically plausible candidate pathway. However, the available data do not confirm that this association is mediated through genetically regulated LPL expression in blood. Larger prospective and ancestry-specific pregnancy studies integrating pregnancy-relevant molecular data are warranted to clarify temporality and tissue-specific mechanisms.

Lipids in Health and Disease
Second Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.