Development's Race Problem: Post‐Black Lives Matter Erasures, Palestine and the Politics of Publishing

ABSTRACT Despite efforts by critical scholars of development to centre race in their analysis, Development Studies remains entangled in its racist history and contemporary imperialism. New troubling forms of oppression and control within the discipline's approach to race have emerged, marking the post‐Black Lives Matter era as a point of transition between old and new erasures of race. We argue that although race is no longer ignored, the discursive and material boundaries within which it can be discussed have been erected through silencing, censorship, regulation and appropriation. Drawing on our failed attempt to publish a special issue on race, (anti‐)racism and development, we focus on the specificity of Palestine as indicative of new erasures. We explore the theoretical implications this has and uncover how Palestine illuminates and unsettles the boundaries between race and development. Through this, we attempt to build a case for development's reclamation as a liberatory project of radical repoliticisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70220
Primary Topic
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development's Race Problem: Post‐Black Lives Matter Erasures, Palestine and the Politics of Publishing

Jenna Marshall, Kamna Patel, Althea-Maria Rivas, Kalpana Wilson et al.
Antipode
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
article

Development's Race Problem: Post‐Black Lives Matter Erasures, Palestine and the Politics of Publishing

Jenna Marshall, Kamna Patel, Althea-Maria Rivas, Kalpana Wilson, Robtel Neajai Pailey
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite efforts by critical scholars of development to centre race in their analysis, Development Studies remains entangled in its racist history and contemporary imperialism. New troubling forms of oppression and control within the discipline's approach to race have emerged, marking the post‐Black Lives Matter era as a point of transition between old and new erasures of race. We argue that although race is no longer ignored, the discursive and material boundaries within which it can be discussed have been erected through silencing, censorship, regulation and appropriation. Drawing on our failed attempt to publish a special issue on race, (anti‐)racism and development, we focus on the specificity of Palestine as indicative of new erasures. We explore the theoretical implications this has and uncover how Palestine illuminates and unsettles the boundaries between race and development. Through this, we attempt to build a case for development's reclamation as a liberatory project of radical repoliticisation.

AntipodeVol. 58(6)
SOAS University of London (GB), The London College (GB), University College London (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.