Probation duration: Do longer probation sentences increase public safety?

In this study we examine whether or not incremental increases in the duration of a probation sentence increase public safety as measured by recidivism. Using 10 years of data from the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing merged with data from the Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts we compare recidivism outcomes for similarly situated individuals sentenced to shorter or longer periods of probation based on natural judicial variation in sentencing outcomes. Using inverse probability weighting techniques with covariate balancing propensity scores we find that recidivism is not substantially or significantly reduced by longer periods of probation, and that longer probation sentences may indeed be counterproductive. Our findings are timely and important as over 3 million Americans are currently on probation supervision, and many jurisdictions are currently undertaking efforts to reform probation policies that include capping the length of probation sentences. We believe our findings are an important contribution to the ongoing academic and policy conversation regarding appropriate use, and length of, probation sentences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102730
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Probation duration: Do longer probation sentences increase public safety?

Megan C. Kurlychek, Matthew Kleiman, Jordan Zvonkovich
Journal of Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Probation duration: Do longer probation sentences increase public safety?

Megan C. Kurlychek, Matthew Kleiman, Jordan Zvonkovich
article en

Abstract

In this study we examine whether or not incremental increases in the duration of a probation sentence increase public safety as measured by recidivism. Using 10 years of data from the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing merged with data from the Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts we compare recidivism outcomes for similarly situated individuals sentenced to shorter or longer periods of probation based on natural judicial variation in sentencing outcomes. Using inverse probability weighting techniques with covariate balancing propensity scores we find that recidivism is not substantially or significantly reduced by longer periods of probation, and that longer probation sentences may indeed be counterproductive. Our findings are timely and important as over 3 million Americans are currently on probation supervision, and many jurisdictions are currently undertaking efforts to reform probation policies that include capping the length of probation sentences. We believe our findings are an important contribution to the ongoing academic and policy conversation regarding appropriate use, and length of, probation sentences.

Journal of Criminal JusticeVol. 107
Florida State University (US), Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (US), Florida Department of State (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.