Insufficient Effort Responding and Adolescent Respondents: Measurement, Extent, and Prediction

This article addresses insufficient effort responding (IER), an issue in survey research affecting data quality. We focus on predicting reactive-check-based IER classifications through nonreactive measures and estimating the proportion of respondents classified as IER in a pupil population, using a sizeable adolescent survey. The analysis highlights IER as a nonmarginal issue that varies considerably by gender, migration status, and school type. Utilizing Random Forest models, we evaluate nonreactive measures’ predictive power for reactive-check-based IER classifications, notably response time, intraindividual response variability, and Mahalanobis Distance. The findings show these measures’ future research value, emphasizing the strong influence of response time. We also explore the relationship between predictors and our target variable and find that shorter response times and less response variability correspond to a greater likelihood of IER. This study illustrates the potential of nonreactive measures and advanced machine learning techniques for identifying IER and highlights the necessity for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Methods & Research
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241261484518
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Insufficient Effort Responding and Adolescent Respondents: Measurement, Extent, and Prediction

Christine Sälzer, Susanne Vogl, Thomas Krause
Sociological Methods & Research
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Insufficient Effort Responding and Adolescent Respondents: Measurement, Extent, and Prediction

Christine Sälzer, Susanne Vogl, Thomas Krause
article en

Abstract

This article addresses insufficient effort responding (IER), an issue in survey research affecting data quality. We focus on predicting reactive-check-based IER classifications through nonreactive measures and estimating the proportion of respondents classified as IER in a pupil population, using a sizeable adolescent survey. The analysis highlights IER as a nonmarginal issue that varies considerably by gender, migration status, and school type. Utilizing Random Forest models, we evaluate nonreactive measures’ predictive power for reactive-check-based IER classifications, notably response time, intraindividual response variability, and Mahalanobis Distance. The findings show these measures’ future research value, emphasizing the strong influence of response time. We also explore the relationship between predictors and our target variable and find that shorter response times and less response variability correspond to a greater likelihood of IER. This study illustrates the potential of nonreactive measures and advanced machine learning techniques for identifying IER and highlights the necessity for further research.

Sociological Methods & Research
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Insufficient Effort Responding and Adolescent Respondents: Measurement, Extent, and Prediction — Christine Sälzer, Susanne Vogl, et al. · Sociological Methods & Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS