Stratum: Lie Field Layers for Grid Logic Puzzles in Small Transformers

We introduce Lie field layers, which add a decaying, optionally rotating recurrence over sequence positions to a transformer’s residual stream, and evaluate them on abstract-vocabulary grid logic puzzles. This version 1.1 corrects errors in version 1.0; every change is listed in Section 9. On 3×3 puzzles, a small transformer with a Lie field layer reaches 0.933 ± 0.022 puzzle accuracy against 0.874 ± 0.037 for the baseline across 13 seeds per arm (p=0.0001 by a rank test with one poorly converged baseline seed excluded, a choice made after the results were seen; p<0.001 with it included). A decay-only ablation with the same parameter count shows that the SO(d) rotation contributes (+0.039, p=0.0075), although its share of the gain is poorly determined; whether decay alone helps is unresolved. On 4×4 puzzles we find no mean improvement: across 15 seeds the layer gives 0.096 ± 0.032 against 0.108 ± 0.014 for the baseline, with large seed-to-seed variation. Removing the sigmoid gate does not collapse accuracy, and we withdraw version 1.0’s claim that the gate is necessary. Validation loss ranks trained models well at the checkpoints we report but is a poor stopping criterion: at 3×3 it rises while accuracy is still improving. The puzzles contain no ordering relations, a limitation of the data generator that we disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22848974
Primary Topic
VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Stratum: Lie Field Layers for Grid Logic Puzzles in Small Transformers

Curtis Sandoval
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
preprint

Stratum: Lie Field Layers for Grid Logic Puzzles in Small Transformers

Curtis Sandoval
preprint en

Abstract

We introduce Lie field layers, which add a decaying, optionally rotating recurrence over sequence positions to a transformer’s residual stream, and evaluate them on abstract-vocabulary grid logic puzzles. This version 1.1 corrects errors in version 1.0; every change is listed in Section 9. On 3×3 puzzles, a small transformer with a Lie field layer reaches 0.933 ± 0.022 puzzle accuracy against 0.874 ± 0.037 for the baseline across 13 seeds per arm (p=0.0001 by a rank test with one poorly converged baseline seed excluded, a choice made after the results were seen; p<0.001 with it included). A decay-only ablation with the same parameter count shows that the SO(d) rotation contributes (+0.039, p=0.0075), although its share of the gain is poorly determined; whether decay alone helps is unresolved. On 4×4 puzzles we find no mean improvement: across 15 seeds the layer gives 0.096 ± 0.032 against 0.108 ± 0.014 for the baseline, with large seed-to-seed variation. Removing the sigmoid gate does not collapse accuracy, and we withdraw version 1.0’s claim that the gate is necessary. Validation loss ranks trained models well at the checkpoints we report but is a poor stopping criterion: at 3×3 it rises while accuracy is still improving. The puzzles contain no ordering relations, a limitation of the data generator that we disclose.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lexmark (United States) (US)
VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stratum: Lie Field Layers for Grid Logic Puzzles in Small Transformers — Curtis Sandoval · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS