The older, the better: information uncertainty and stock price crash risk in China's A-share market

Purpose This study examines the effect of information uncertainty (IU) on stock price crash risk. Although ambiguity aversion theory predicts that investors overweight bad news under uncertainty, thereby producing asymmetric market responses, existing empirical evidence has largely focused on asset returns, analyst behavior and small-scale experimental settings. By mapping ambiguity-aversion predictions directly onto crash risk, this study provides large-sample, market-level validation of these mechanisms using real trading data. Design/methodology/approach Using data on China's A-share listed firms from 2009 to 2019, we estimate market-adjusted firm-specific returns with a market index model and measure crash risk using negative conditional skewness (NCSKEW) and down-to-up volatility (DUVOL). IU is captured in two ways: firm listing age as a parsimonious proxy and a composite index constructed from analyst coverage, analyst forecast dispersion, idiosyncratic volatility, share turnover and firm size. Robustness is established through fixed-effects regressions, GMM estimation and propensity score matching. Findings Higher information uncertainty significantly increases stock price crash risk, and the results are robust across alternative specifications, estimation methods and IU measures. Mediation analysis rules out two competing channels, namely managerial bad-news hoarding and investor disagreement, supporting the argument that ambiguity itself elevates crash risk through investors' asymmetric processing of information. Originality/value This study provides large-sample empirical evidence that ambiguity aversion mechanisms translate directly into stock price tail risk. By demonstrating that IU raises crash risk through asymmetric investor responses rather than through information concealment or opinion divergence, we bridge the theoretical and experimental ambiguity-aversion literature with the empirical crash risk literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Behavioral Finance
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rbf-04-2026-0212
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The older, the better: information uncertainty and stock price crash risk in China's A-share market

Chen Di-qiang, Lian Guo, Haigang Zhou
Review of Behavioral Finance
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

The older, the better: information uncertainty and stock price crash risk in China's A-share market

Chen Di-qiang, Lian Guo, Haigang Zhou
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the effect of information uncertainty (IU) on stock price crash risk. Although ambiguity aversion theory predicts that investors overweight bad news under uncertainty, thereby producing asymmetric market responses, existing empirical evidence has largely focused on asset returns, analyst behavior and small-scale experimental settings. By mapping ambiguity-aversion predictions directly onto crash risk, this study provides large-sample, market-level validation of these mechanisms using real trading data. Design/methodology/approach Using data on China's A-share listed firms from 2009 to 2019, we estimate market-adjusted firm-specific returns with a market index model and measure crash risk using negative conditional skewness (NCSKEW) and down-to-up volatility (DUVOL). IU is captured in two ways: firm listing age as a parsimonious proxy and a composite index constructed from analyst coverage, analyst forecast dispersion, idiosyncratic volatility, share turnover and firm size. Robustness is established through fixed-effects regressions, GMM estimation and propensity score matching. Findings Higher information uncertainty significantly increases stock price crash risk, and the results are robust across alternative specifications, estimation methods and IU measures. Mediation analysis rules out two competing channels, namely managerial bad-news hoarding and investor disagreement, supporting the argument that ambiguity itself elevates crash risk through investors' asymmetric processing of information. Originality/value This study provides large-sample empirical evidence that ambiguity aversion mechanisms translate directly into stock price tail risk. By demonstrating that IU raises crash risk through asymmetric investor responses rather than through information concealment or opinion divergence, we bridge the theoretical and experimental ambiguity-aversion literature with the empirical crash risk literature.

Review of Behavioral Finance
Cleveland State University (US), Gannan Normal University (CN), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.