Human perception of ergonomic demand and safety across physical tasks

This study examines how professional background and personal protective equipment (PPE) use affect perceptions of ergonomic ease, task risk, skillfulness and safety. While ergonomics research has focused on biomechanical load, less is known about how individuals perceive ergonomic demand across tasks. A total of 94 individuals, including laypersons and professionals, performed structured tasks in three domains: assembling objects using four tools; executing a 12-step culinary sequence involving actions such as chopping, stirring and oven use; and ascending and descending ladders under different PPE conditions. Statistical analyses included t tests, Pearson correlation and Bayesian models to assess group-level differences and interactions. Professionals perceived lower risk in assembly (e.g., spanner; t = 2.52, p < 0.05), greater comfort in culinary tasks (e.g., stirring; t = −2.57, p < 0.05) and higher perceived safety during ladder activities with combined PPE use. These findings show how expertise and PPE shape ergonomic perceptions, supporting task-specific safety solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2026.2723660
Primary Topic
Safety Warnings and Signage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Human perception of ergonomic demand and safety across physical tasks

Heejin Jeong, Hari Iyer
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Safety Warnings and Signage
article

Human perception of ergonomic demand and safety across physical tasks

Heejin Jeong, Hari Iyer
article en

Abstract

This study examines how professional background and personal protective equipment (PPE) use affect perceptions of ergonomic ease, task risk, skillfulness and safety. While ergonomics research has focused on biomechanical load, less is known about how individuals perceive ergonomic demand across tasks. A total of 94 individuals, including laypersons and professionals, performed structured tasks in three domains: assembling objects using four tools; executing a 12-step culinary sequence involving actions such as chopping, stirring and oven use; and ascending and descending ladders under different PPE conditions. Statistical analyses included t tests, Pearson correlation and Bayesian models to assess group-level differences and interactions. Professionals perceived lower risk in assembly (e.g., spanner; t = 2.52, p < 0.05), greater comfort in culinary tasks (e.g., stirring; t = −2.57, p < 0.05) and higher perceived safety during ladder activities with combined PPE use. These findings show how expertise and PPE shape ergonomic perceptions, supporting task-specific safety solutions.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Safety Warnings and Signage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human perception of ergonomic demand and safety across physical tasks — Heejin Jeong, Hari Iyer · International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS