Are maternal eating demonstrations associated with infant food acceptance? An observational study of solid food introduction in infancy

Research with infants highlights an early capacity to learn from social partners, particularly about concepts that would be difficult to learn independently. However, scant literature examines social learning (such as the impact of demonstrations) on infants’ acceptance of foods, even though the timeline of solid food introduction (recommended to start at age 6 months) aligns with emerging capacities for infant social learning, making solid foods an ecologically valid category of unfamiliar stimuli. The present research examines whether infants eat more food at 6 ( n = 103), 9 ( n = 104), and 12 ( n = 101) months when their mothers demonstrate eating and the factors that predict maternal eating demonstrations. Although the frequency of maternal eating demonstrations was positively associated with infant bites, we observed low levels of maternal eating demonstrations (fewer than 30% of mothers demonstrated eating at each infant age). Infants tended to eat more of familiar versus unfamiliar foods, yet mothers did not differ in their demonstrations of eating familiar versus unfamiliar foods. Mothers were more likely to demonstrate eating foods when the observations took place during shared meals (rather than individual infant feedings) and when feeding older infants, with more demonstrations occurring at the 9- and 12-month age points compared to the 6-month age point. Eating demonstrations are discussed as a potential target for intervention deserving further study given that we rarely observed spontaneous eating demonstrations in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Appetite
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2026.108787
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Are maternal eating demonstrations associated with infant food acceptance? An observational study of solid food introduction in infancy

Jasmine M. DeJesus, Alison L. Miller, Julie C. Lumeng, Shruthi Venkatesh et al.
Appetite
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
article

Are maternal eating demonstrations associated with infant food acceptance? An observational study of solid food introduction in infancy

Jasmine M. DeJesus, Alison L. Miller, Julie C. Lumeng, Shruthi Venkatesh, Ashley N. Gearhardt, Julie Sturza
article en

Abstract

Research with infants highlights an early capacity to learn from social partners, particularly about concepts that would be difficult to learn independently. However, scant literature examines social learning (such as the impact of demonstrations) on infants’ acceptance of foods, even though the timeline of solid food introduction (recommended to start at age 6 months) aligns with emerging capacities for infant social learning, making solid foods an ecologically valid category of unfamiliar stimuli. The present research examines whether infants eat more food at 6 ( n = 103), 9 ( n = 104), and 12 ( n = 101) months when their mothers demonstrate eating and the factors that predict maternal eating demonstrations. Although the frequency of maternal eating demonstrations was positively associated with infant bites, we observed low levels of maternal eating demonstrations (fewer than 30% of mothers demonstrated eating at each infant age). Infants tended to eat more of familiar versus unfamiliar foods, yet mothers did not differ in their demonstrations of eating familiar versus unfamiliar foods. Mothers were more likely to demonstrate eating foods when the observations took place during shared meals (rather than individual infant feedings) and when feeding older infants, with more demonstrations occurring at the 9- and 12-month age points compared to the 6-month age point. Eating demonstrations are discussed as a potential target for intervention deserving further study given that we rarely observed spontaneous eating demonstrations in this study.

AppetiteVol. 228
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), University of Michigan (US), Institute for Literature (BG), Michigan United (US), University of Global Health Equity (RW)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.