Key challenges for in vitro testing of tobacco and next generation products for regulatory applications: Recommendations for the Ames test

The Ames bacterial mutagenesis assay (Ames test) has been used for more than 50 years, to help assess the safety of a variety of single chemicals and complex mixtures in the form of solids, liquids or aerosols. Because of the diverse range of substances that need to be tested, many modifications of this test, as well as modifications of the methods by which the test substances are prepared and applied to the bacterial test system, have been developed. Currently, there is a need for mutagenicity testing of both traditional tobacco products and next generation products (NGPs) such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, tobacco-free nicotine products, oral pouches, etc. There are currently no standardised guidelines that cover the differing, often complex, procedures used by different laboratories to assess NGPs with the Ames test. To address this problem, the Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) convened a workshop, where representatives of industry, government, academia, contract research organisations (CROs) and non-government organisations (NGOs) could present bespoke experimental techniques and data from their testing platforms. The further aim of the workshop was to help formulate some general guidelines that could be used in the testing of tobacco and nicotine products, to allow better comparisons to be made between laboratories. The workshop discussions also resulted in the identification of some suggested areas for future research activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929261489755
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Key challenges for in vitro testing of tobacco and next generation products for regulatory applications: Recommendations for the Ames test

Guy Lalonde, Katarina Aleksa, Roman Wieczorek, Hans Raabe et al.
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Key challenges for in vitro testing of tobacco and next generation products for regulatory applications: Recommendations for the Ames test

Guy Lalonde, Katarina Aleksa, Roman Wieczorek, Hans Raabe, Ian Crooks, Sara Hurtado, M. Hollings, Rodger Curren, Robert Leverette, Mariano Scian, Leon Stankowski, Martha Moore, Tao Chen
article en

Abstract

The Ames bacterial mutagenesis assay (Ames test) has been used for more than 50 years, to help assess the safety of a variety of single chemicals and complex mixtures in the form of solids, liquids or aerosols. Because of the diverse range of substances that need to be tested, many modifications of this test, as well as modifications of the methods by which the test substances are prepared and applied to the bacterial test system, have been developed. Currently, there is a need for mutagenicity testing of both traditional tobacco products and next generation products (NGPs) such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, tobacco-free nicotine products, oral pouches, etc. There are currently no standardised guidelines that cover the differing, often complex, procedures used by different laboratories to assess NGPs with the Ames test. To address this problem, the Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) convened a workshop, where representatives of industry, government, academia, contract research organisations (CROs) and non-government organisations (NGOs) could present bespoke experimental techniques and data from their testing platforms. The further aim of the workshop was to help formulate some general guidelines that could be used in the testing of tobacco and nicotine products, to allow better comparisons to be made between laboratories. The workshop discussions also resulted in the identification of some suggested areas for future research activities.

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
National Center for Toxicological Research (US), Altran (France) (FR), LabCorp (United States) (US), GAM Investments (GB), Institute for In Vitro Sciences (US), Martel (CH), Charles River Laboratories (United States) (US), Research Applications (United States) (US), British American Tobacco (Germany) (DE), Orthopaedic Research of Virginia (US), Altria (United States) (US), Nutrition International (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.