The effects of motivative augmentals emphasizing positive versus negative reinforcement on performance

Research on how leadership communication motivates employee performance is limited. Statements made by leadership may function as a type of verbal motivating operation, known as a motivative augmental, that alters the value of reinforcement for a behavior and changes the likelihood of that behavior as a result. How these statements affect responding when referencing different types of reinforcement, however, remains unknown. The current study utilized a single-subject, counterbalanced reversal design to evaluate statements targeting positive versus negative social reinforcers. Twenty participants were randomly assigned to a positive-statement-first or a negative-statement-first condition sequence. Results indicated no clear difference between the two types of statements; however, participants engaged in more responding when presented with the statement highlighting positive reinforcement first relative to those exposed to the negative statement first. More research is needed to confirm these findings, but they suggest the order in which these statements are presented may impact their effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2026.2733262
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The effects of motivative augmentals emphasizing positive versus negative reinforcement on performance

Sharlet D. Rafacz, Rocky Perez, Sean Borboa
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

The effects of motivative augmentals emphasizing positive versus negative reinforcement on performance

Sharlet D. Rafacz, Rocky Perez, Sean Borboa
article en

Abstract

Research on how leadership communication motivates employee performance is limited. Statements made by leadership may function as a type of verbal motivating operation, known as a motivative augmental, that alters the value of reinforcement for a behavior and changes the likelihood of that behavior as a result. How these statements affect responding when referencing different types of reinforcement, however, remains unknown. The current study utilized a single-subject, counterbalanced reversal design to evaluate statements targeting positive versus negative social reinforcers. Twenty participants were randomly assigned to a positive-statement-first or a negative-statement-first condition sequence. Results indicated no clear difference between the two types of statements; however, participants engaged in more responding when presented with the statement highlighting positive reinforcement first relative to those exposed to the negative statement first. More research is needed to confirm these findings, but they suggest the order in which these statements are presented may impact their effectiveness.

Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
Western Michigan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The effects of motivative augmentals emphasizing positive versus negative reinforcement on performance — Sharlet D. Rafacz, Rocky Perez, et al. · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS