On Confederate Monuments, Their Removal and Racial Bias

The presence of Confederate monuments and their removal has been a frequent topic of societal discussion in the United States. Taking a situational perspective (i.e. the Bias of Crowds model), the present paper investigated whether the presence of Confederate monuments and their removal from an area causally affect the racial biases of people in that area. Across multiple large-scale data analyses ( N 1 = 1,753,557), online experiments ( N 2a = 1,164, N 2b = 416, N 3 = 537), and a field study ( N 4 = 176), we found no evidence that the presence or removal of Confederate monuments reliably affects the implicit (or explicit) racial biases of people. We discuss implications for situational models of bias and best research practices for conducting geographical difference studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261480534
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

On Confederate Monuments, Their Removal and Racial Bias

Ruddy Faure, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Nicolas Sommet, Amanda B. Diekman et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

On Confederate Monuments, Their Removal and Racial Bias

Ruddy Faure, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Nicolas Sommet, Amanda B. Diekman, Tessa A. M. Lansu, Rob W. Holland, Heidi A. Vuletich, Maximilian Primbs, B. Keith Payne
article en

Abstract

The presence of Confederate monuments and their removal has been a frequent topic of societal discussion in the United States. Taking a situational perspective (i.e. the Bias of Crowds model), the present paper investigated whether the presence of Confederate monuments and their removal from an area causally affect the racial biases of people in that area. Across multiple large-scale data analyses ( N 1 = 1,753,557), online experiments ( N 2a = 1,164, N 2b = 416, N 3 = 537), and a field study ( N 4 = 176), we found no evidence that the presence or removal of Confederate monuments reliably affects the implicit (or explicit) racial biases of people. We discuss implications for situational models of bias and best research practices for conducting geographical difference studies.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Denver (US), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Lausanne (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Confederate Monuments, Their Removal and Racial Bias — Ruddy Faure, Gijsbert Bijlstra, et al. · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS