Centre-State relations and Punjab politics: Federalism, state autonomy and emerging political conflicts 2016-2026

This paper analyses Centre-State relations in Punjab from 2016 to 2026 through federalism, state autonomy, intergovernmental bargaining, and political conflict. Using qualitative, descriptive-analytical document analysis, it examines agricultural federalism, GST-related fiscal pressures, and Governor-government disputes, the territorial and administrative issues surrounding Chandigarh , the Sutlej-Yamuna Link canal, and the expansion of Border Security Force jurisdiction. The study finds that Punjab’s relationship with the Union reflects contested interdependence in which cooperation in procurement, taxation, grants, security, and inter-state matters coexists with disputes over legislative competence, resources, and institutional authority. It argues that contemporary Punjab combines cooperative, bargaining, and confrontational federalism. Stronger consultation, clearer constitutional practice, predictable fiscal arrangements, and institutionalized dispute-resolution mechanisms are therefore necessary to strengthen federal stability while preserving meaningful state autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Humanities International
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.66728/sshi.v4i7.557565
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Centre-State relations and Punjab politics: Federalism, state autonomy and emerging political conflicts 2016-2026

Gurpreet Singh
Social Science & Humanities International
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Centre-State relations and Punjab politics: Federalism, state autonomy and emerging political conflicts 2016-2026

Gurpreet Singh
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses Centre-State relations in Punjab from 2016 to 2026 through federalism, state autonomy, intergovernmental bargaining, and political conflict. Using qualitative, descriptive-analytical document analysis, it examines agricultural federalism, GST-related fiscal pressures, and Governor-government disputes, the territorial and administrative issues surrounding Chandigarh , the Sutlej-Yamuna Link canal, and the expansion of Border Security Force jurisdiction. The study finds that Punjab’s relationship with the Union reflects contested interdependence in which cooperation in procurement, taxation, grants, security, and inter-state matters coexists with disputes over legislative competence, resources, and institutional authority. It argues that contemporary Punjab combines cooperative, bargaining, and confrontational federalism. Stronger consultation, clearer constitutional practice, predictable fiscal arrangements, and institutionalized dispute-resolution mechanisms are therefore necessary to strengthen federal stability while preserving meaningful state autonomy.

Social Science & Humanities InternationalVol. 4(7)
Asian Social Institute (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Centre-State relations and Punjab politics: Federalism, state autonomy and emerging political conflicts 2016-2026 — Gurpreet Singh · Social Science & Humanities International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS