Exploring an energy-density adjustment to the Nutri-Score algorithm for general foods

Abstract Purpose The Nutri-Score categorizes foods by nutritional value per 100 g or 100 ml, which may lead to poor discriminatory ability for products with low energy density and large portion sizes, like ready-to-eat meals. We hypothesized that adapting the Nutri-Score algorithm to account for variation in energy density could better capture nutritional quality, particularly in lower energy-dense foods like ready meals, without substantially affecting other food scores. The aim of this study was to perform a proof‑of‑concept evaluation of adapting the Nutri-Score algorithm for general foods to different levels of energy density. Methods This study utilized the Norwegian food databases Tradesolution and Unil ( N = 25,813) to compare the energy-adjusted algorithm with the Nutri-Score 2023. Results The energy-adjusted Nutri-Score shifted food categorizations for 22% of products. Foods with low energy density, such as ready meals, showed increased scoring variation, indicating a more nuanced nutritional quality assessment, as intended. In these foods, we also saw a decline in favourable scores and an increase in unfavourable ones. However, high-energy-density food categories, like cakes and pastries, more often received more favourable scores. Also, the discriminatory ability between low-fat and full-fat products was reduced. Conclusion While the energy-adjusted Nutri-Score improved scoring differentiation for certain low-energy-density foods, it showed unfavourable side-effects, indicating that overall, it is not superior to the Nutri-Score 2023. Nonetheless, adapting the algorithm to energy density offers potential for improved nutrient profiling methodologies in specific contexts. Further refinement of the weighting system could address observed weaknesses, optimizing this approach for broader application.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-026-04105-5
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exploring an energy-density adjustment to the Nutri-Score algorithm for general foods

Marianne Hope Abel, Bryndís Eva Birgisdóttir, Mari Mohn Paulsen, Lene Frost Andersen et al.
European Journal of Nutrition
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Exploring an energy-density adjustment to the Nutri-Score algorithm for general foods

Marianne Hope Abel, Bryndís Eva Birgisdóttir, Mari Mohn Paulsen, Lene Frost Andersen, Anne Lise Brantsæter, Anja Pia Biltoft-Jensen, Marta Bianchi, Anna Amberntsson, Dina Moxness Konglevoll
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The Nutri-Score categorizes foods by nutritional value per 100 g or 100 ml, which may lead to poor discriminatory ability for products with low energy density and large portion sizes, like ready-to-eat meals. We hypothesized that adapting the Nutri-Score algorithm to account for variation in energy density could better capture nutritional quality, particularly in lower energy-dense foods like ready meals, without substantially affecting other food scores. The aim of this study was to perform a proof‑of‑concept evaluation of adapting the Nutri-Score algorithm for general foods to different levels of energy density. Methods This study utilized the Norwegian food databases Tradesolution and Unil ( N = 25,813) to compare the energy-adjusted algorithm with the Nutri-Score 2023. Results The energy-adjusted Nutri-Score shifted food categorizations for 22% of products. Foods with low energy density, such as ready meals, showed increased scoring variation, indicating a more nuanced nutritional quality assessment, as intended. In these foods, we also saw a decline in favourable scores and an increase in unfavourable ones. However, high-energy-density food categories, like cakes and pastries, more often received more favourable scores. Also, the discriminatory ability between low-fat and full-fat products was reduced. Conclusion While the energy-adjusted Nutri-Score improved scoring differentiation for certain low-energy-density foods, it showed unfavourable side-effects, indicating that overall, it is not superior to the Nutri-Score 2023. Nonetheless, adapting the algorithm to energy density offers potential for improved nutrient profiling methodologies in specific contexts. Further refinement of the weighting system could address observed weaknesses, optimizing this approach for broader application.

European Journal of NutritionVol. 65(7)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.