Coordinated operational optimization of a variable-speed pre-expander and bypass for compressed air energy storage

The discharge process of compressed air energy storage (CAES) is challenged by inlet throttling loss and off-design mismatch caused by continuously declining cavern pressure. To address this issue, a coordinated operational optimization integrating a variable-speed pre-expander with a bypass is proposed. CFD-derived performance maps for the pre-expander and four main-expander sections are coupled with an air-side thermodynamic model and assessed under three aerodynamic-power-constrained discharge modes: fixed main-expander power (Mode A), fixed total unit power (Mode B), and sliding-pressure operation with a minimum power constraint (Mode C). Relative to matched main-expander-only baselines, the constant-speed pre-expander–bypass configuration increases cumulative aerodynamic work by 6.54%, 6.05%, and 3.10% in Modes A–C, respectively, while variable-speed optimization raises these gains to 6.69%, 6.27%, and 3.13%. In Modes A and B, the improvement results from additional heating and a 65.65%–79.95% reduction in throttling exergy destruction. In Mode C, it mainly reflects expansion-ratio redistribution and lower flow-dependent pressure losses, yielding an air-side discharge exergy efficiency of about 90.6%. Compared with constant-speed operation, variable-speed operation further increases the ME-referenced cumulative-work gains by 0.15, 0.22, and 0.03 percentage points in Modes A, B, and C, respectively. When the corresponding whole-train work increments are normalized by the cumulative pre-expander outputs, they represent 2.27%, 3.09%, and 0.50%, respectively. A practical two-stage rule—3150 rpm while an upstream throttling margin is available and 3300 rpm after this margin is exhausted—reproduces the stepwise-optimized Mode A and B gains within 0.03 percentage points.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2026.142457
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Coordinated operational optimization of a variable-speed pre-expander and bypass for compressed air energy storage

Yangli Zhu, Xianchao Pan, Zebing Chen, Yuncheng Chao et al.
Energy
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Coordinated operational optimization of a variable-speed pre-expander and bypass for compressed air energy storage

Yangli Zhu, Xianchao Pan, Zebing Chen, Yuncheng Chao, Xing Wang, Haisheng Chen
article en

Abstract

The discharge process of compressed air energy storage (CAES) is challenged by inlet throttling loss and off-design mismatch caused by continuously declining cavern pressure. To address this issue, a coordinated operational optimization integrating a variable-speed pre-expander with a bypass is proposed. CFD-derived performance maps for the pre-expander and four main-expander sections are coupled with an air-side thermodynamic model and assessed under three aerodynamic-power-constrained discharge modes: fixed main-expander power (Mode A), fixed total unit power (Mode B), and sliding-pressure operation with a minimum power constraint (Mode C). Relative to matched main-expander-only baselines, the constant-speed pre-expander–bypass configuration increases cumulative aerodynamic work by 6.54%, 6.05%, and 3.10% in Modes A–C, respectively, while variable-speed optimization raises these gains to 6.69%, 6.27%, and 3.13%. In Modes A and B, the improvement results from additional heating and a 65.65%–79.95% reduction in throttling exergy destruction. In Mode C, it mainly reflects expansion-ratio redistribution and lower flow-dependent pressure losses, yielding an air-side discharge exergy efficiency of about 90.6%. Compared with constant-speed operation, variable-speed operation further increases the ME-referenced cumulative-work gains by 0.15, 0.22, and 0.03 percentage points in Modes A, B, and C, respectively. When the corresponding whole-train work increments are normalized by the cumulative pre-expander outputs, they represent 2.27%, 3.09%, and 0.50%, respectively. A practical two-stage rule—3150 rpm while an upstream throttling margin is available and 3300 rpm after this margin is exhausted—reproduces the stepwise-optimized Mode A and B gains within 0.03 percentage points.

EnergyVol. 364
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Engineering Thermophysics (CN), Energy Foundation (CN), Institute of High Energy Physics (AT), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.