Multi-criteria kinetic modeling of kerogen hydrothermal conversion: assessing network complexity and model selection

The kerogen-rich oil shale deposits constitute a strategically vital unconventional resource base. However, suitable kinetic studies that represent the reactions for developing appropriate technologies are scarce. This study systematically evaluates the predictive accuracy of kinetic models for kerogen conversion under hydrothermal conditions through the interplay among reaction network complexity, objective function selection, and stoichiometric constraints. These simulation choices, while often treated independently, have a cumulative impact on model fidelity. By benchmarking a three-pathway parallel reaction scheme against a single global reaction model across both catalytic (nickel tallate) and thermal systems, the investigation reveals that considering the complexity of kerogen reduces prediction errors by 16–45%. It also highlights a key choice between two optimization methods: average absolute error focuses on overall accuracy, while the sum of squared errors emphasizes precision for the most significant components. Lastly, the study emphasizes the importance of adhering to stoichiometric constraints to ensure physical consistency and prevent overfitting. Concurrently, nickel tallate catalysis nearly doubled kerogen conversion while selectively channeling products toward light oils, underscoring the synergistic potential of coupling optimized catalytic strategies with rigorously formulated kinetic models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.141274
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multi-criteria kinetic modeling of kerogen hydrothermal conversion: assessing network complexity and model selection

Mikhail A. Varfolomeev, Jorge Ancheyta, А. Н. Михайлова, F. V. Aliev et al.
Fuel
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Multi-criteria kinetic modeling of kerogen hydrothermal conversion: assessing network complexity and model selection

Mikhail A. Varfolomeev, Jorge Ancheyta, А. Н. Михайлова, F. V. Aliev, Guillermo Félix, О.В. Жданеев, Konstantin Prochukhan, Alexis Tirado, Ameen A. Al-Muntaser, Alexey Vakhin, Muneer A. Suwaid, Mohammed A. Abdullah, Konstantin N. Frolov
article en

Abstract

The kerogen-rich oil shale deposits constitute a strategically vital unconventional resource base. However, suitable kinetic studies that represent the reactions for developing appropriate technologies are scarce. This study systematically evaluates the predictive accuracy of kinetic models for kerogen conversion under hydrothermal conditions through the interplay among reaction network complexity, objective function selection, and stoichiometric constraints. These simulation choices, while often treated independently, have a cumulative impact on model fidelity. By benchmarking a three-pathway parallel reaction scheme against a single global reaction model across both catalytic (nickel tallate) and thermal systems, the investigation reveals that considering the complexity of kerogen reduces prediction errors by 16–45%. It also highlights a key choice between two optimization methods: average absolute error focuses on overall accuracy, while the sum of squared errors emphasizes precision for the most significant components. Lastly, the study emphasizes the importance of adhering to stoichiometric constraints to ensure physical consistency and prevent overfitting. Concurrently, nickel tallate catalysis nearly doubled kerogen conversion while selectively channeling products toward light oils, underscoring the synergistic potential of coupling optimized catalytic strategies with rigorously formulated kinetic models.

FuelVol. 430
Kazan Federal University (RU), Centre for Independent Social Research (RU), Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.