Influence of the mentoring relationship between board chairs and women CEOs on firm performance in Australia: a social role perspective

Abstract Underrepresentation of women in CEO and board-chair roles persists despite decades of scholarly effort, posing a major societal concern by depriving societies of the positive contributions of women’s leadership. While existing studies have predominantly investigated boards’ monitoring and advisory roles, our study departs from this tradition by examining the mentoring role of board-chairs. We aim to identify why the CEO role remains male dominated and specifically investigate whether the ultimate objective outcomes of mentoring contribute to the women’s scarcity in C-suite roles in Australia. We draw on the social role theory to study whether the gender of the board-chair (man or woman) affects the relationship between a woman CEO and company performance. Using a two-stage least squares regression on Australian Stock Exchange 100 (ASX-100) companies from 2010 to 2020, our findings indicate that the outcomes of diverse mentoring not only fail to close the gender gap but may actually exacerbate it within ASX-100 firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-026-00425-4
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Influence of the mentoring relationship between board chairs and women CEOs on firm performance in Australia: a social role perspective

Jyoti Devi Mahadeo, David Wastell, Marie dela Rama
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Influence of the mentoring relationship between board chairs and women CEOs on firm performance in Australia: a social role perspective

Jyoti Devi Mahadeo, David Wastell, Marie dela Rama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Underrepresentation of women in CEO and board-chair roles persists despite decades of scholarly effort, posing a major societal concern by depriving societies of the positive contributions of women’s leadership. While existing studies have predominantly investigated boards’ monitoring and advisory roles, our study departs from this tradition by examining the mentoring role of board-chairs. We aim to identify why the CEO role remains male dominated and specifically investigate whether the ultimate objective outcomes of mentoring contribute to the women’s scarcity in C-suite roles in Australia. We draw on the social role theory to study whether the gender of the board-chair (man or woman) affects the relationship between a woman CEO and company performance. Using a two-stage least squares regression on Australian Stock Exchange 100 (ASX-100) companies from 2010 to 2020, our findings indicate that the outcomes of diverse mentoring not only fail to close the gender gap but may actually exacerbate it within ASX-100 firms.

International Journal of Disclosure and Governance
Institute on Governance (CA), University of Bradford (GB), University of Nottingham (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Influence of the mentoring relationship between board chairs and women CEOs on firm performance in Australia: a social role perspective — Jyoti Devi Mahadeo, David Wastell, et al. · International Journal of Disclosure and Governance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS