The AI health divide: Three challenges and recommendations to improve design, transparency, and access for low-SES communities

Background Low socioeconomic status (SES) communities have been historically disadvantaged by food deserts, limited health and digital literacy, and restricted access to healthcare and digital technologies. These factors have increased the prevalence of chronic disease and contributed to reduced engagement with healthcare systems. Alongside this, the rapid increase in popularity of Artificial Intelligence (AI), integration into healthcare systems such as patient portals, symptom checkers, and care coordination platforms has become commonplace. However, the incorporation of AI assumes inflated levels of digital access, literacy, and cognitive capacity, which risks worsening existing inequalities. Objective This paper examines how AI-enabled digital integration into healthcare systems may inadvertently disadvantage low SES communities, while widening access disparities, exposure, and trust. It then proposes targeted recommendations to improve future AI design and implementation efforts. Methods This paper synthesizes evidence regarding social determinants of health, digital health literacy, and trust in AI to develop a set of practical design guidelines that support the needs of low-SES individuals. We draw from literature pertaining to human factors, health equity, digital health, and inclusive design. Results The analysis identifies barriers in which current AI tools and features misalign with low-SES individuals. We contextualize infrastructure gaps, high cognitive and literacy demands, individual differences, and the use behaviors related to the intersection of SES and AI in healthcare. Conclusion This paper presents design and implementation guidelines to reduce cognitive load, enhance accessibility, and build trust, while ensuring that AI integration in healthcare technologies supports rather than undermines health equity for low SES communities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Work
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261487994
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The AI health divide: Three challenges and recommendations to improve design, transparency, and access for low-SES communities

Lila Berger, Elizabeth H. Lazzara, Joseph R. Keebler, Zander N. Miller et al.
Work
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

The AI health divide: Three challenges and recommendations to improve design, transparency, and access for low-SES communities

Lila Berger, Elizabeth H. Lazzara, Joseph R. Keebler, Zander N. Miller, Elizabeth R Merwin, Shawn Mathura, Grace M Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

Background Low socioeconomic status (SES) communities have been historically disadvantaged by food deserts, limited health and digital literacy, and restricted access to healthcare and digital technologies. These factors have increased the prevalence of chronic disease and contributed to reduced engagement with healthcare systems. Alongside this, the rapid increase in popularity of Artificial Intelligence (AI), integration into healthcare systems such as patient portals, symptom checkers, and care coordination platforms has become commonplace. However, the incorporation of AI assumes inflated levels of digital access, literacy, and cognitive capacity, which risks worsening existing inequalities. Objective This paper examines how AI-enabled digital integration into healthcare systems may inadvertently disadvantage low SES communities, while widening access disparities, exposure, and trust. It then proposes targeted recommendations to improve future AI design and implementation efforts. Methods This paper synthesizes evidence regarding social determinants of health, digital health literacy, and trust in AI to develop a set of practical design guidelines that support the needs of low-SES individuals. We draw from literature pertaining to human factors, health equity, digital health, and inclusive design. Results The analysis identifies barriers in which current AI tools and features misalign with low-SES individuals. We contextualize infrastructure gaps, high cognitive and literacy demands, individual differences, and the use behaviors related to the intersection of SES and AI in healthcare. Conclusion This paper presents design and implementation guidelines to reduce cognitive load, enhance accessibility, and build trust, while ensuring that AI integration in healthcare technologies supports rather than undermines health equity for low SES communities.

Work
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.