A stock coupled water and material circularity framework quantifies the trade off between water and carbon in data center cooling

Abstract Circular-economy research has centered on materials, carbon and energy, while water circularity remains fragmented and rarely linked to data-center water demand. The gap matters across the Sustainable Development Goals: the build-out pursued under SDG 9 claims directly on SDG 6, 12 and 13. This paper develops a stock-coupled water–material flow analysis (WFA–MFA) framework integrating ISO 14,046 water-footprint assessment with Monte Carlo-based Pareto screening. Cooling-water demand is coupled to the installed hardware stock and refresh cycle; embodied (scope-3) fabrication water is included; and AWARE scarcity weighting is applied at each component’s own basin. For a 100 MW reference facility, 10,000 draws propagate uncertainty in cooling and power effectiveness, embodied intensity, fab recycling and grid carbon. Both indices increase with performance. Against an evaporative baseline, counting operational cooling electricity only, sealed closed-loop cooling reaches high water circularity but incurs a carbon penalty that leaves it dominated, within the sampled space, in 78% of draws by direct-to-chip and 53% by immersion. Embodied water constrains low-evaporation designs, supplying about 55% of the water they mobilize, a share robust across the disclosed ranges. Operational water circularity in a stressed basin is assessed an order of magnitude below an identical facility in an abundant one. All figures are illustrative, conditional on the assumed parameter ranges and screened from a finite sample. The boundary omits cooling-hardware and dielectric-fluid manufacture, which favors the liquid architectures; no comparative superiority is claimed. Water nonetheless belongs on the same circular accounting footing as carbon in efficiency mandates and siting rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04733-1
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A stock coupled water and material circularity framework quantifies the trade off between water and carbon in data center cooling

Seyedhossein Sajadifar, Milad Mokhtari, Amir Hossein Nimjerdi, Mohammad Javad Kordani
Discover Sustainability
Process Optimization and Integration
article

A stock coupled water and material circularity framework quantifies the trade off between water and carbon in data center cooling

Seyedhossein Sajadifar, Milad Mokhtari, Amir Hossein Nimjerdi, Mohammad Javad Kordani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Circular-economy research has centered on materials, carbon and energy, while water circularity remains fragmented and rarely linked to data-center water demand. The gap matters across the Sustainable Development Goals: the build-out pursued under SDG 9 claims directly on SDG 6, 12 and 13. This paper develops a stock-coupled water–material flow analysis (WFA–MFA) framework integrating ISO 14,046 water-footprint assessment with Monte Carlo-based Pareto screening. Cooling-water demand is coupled to the installed hardware stock and refresh cycle; embodied (scope-3) fabrication water is included; and AWARE scarcity weighting is applied at each component’s own basin. For a 100 MW reference facility, 10,000 draws propagate uncertainty in cooling and power effectiveness, embodied intensity, fab recycling and grid carbon. Both indices increase with performance. Against an evaporative baseline, counting operational cooling electricity only, sealed closed-loop cooling reaches high water circularity but incurs a carbon penalty that leaves it dominated, within the sampled space, in 78% of draws by direct-to-chip and 53% by immersion. Embodied water constrains low-evaporation designs, supplying about 55% of the water they mobilize, a share robust across the disclosed ranges. Operational water circularity in a stressed basin is assessed an order of magnitude below an identical facility in an abundant one. All figures are illustrative, conditional on the assumed parameter ranges and screened from a finite sample. The boundary omits cooling-hardware and dielectric-fluid manufacture, which favors the liquid architectures; no comparative superiority is claimed. Water nonetheless belongs on the same circular accounting footing as carbon in efficiency mandates and siting rules.

Discover Sustainability
Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), University of Tehran (IR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Process Optimization and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.