Revisiting the Normalization of the Moran's I Index: A Correlation‐Based Approach With Inference

Summary Moran's index, the canonical measure of spatial autocorrelation, may take values outside the interval when arbitrary spatial weight matrices are used. This lack of boundedness complicates interpretation and may lead to misleading conclusions. We systematically evaluate seven approaches aimed at addressing this issue. We first examine conventional rescaling methods based on extreme eigenvalues and show their limitations. We then demonstrate that standard row‐normalizations of the weight matrix do not guarantee the desired bounds. Next, we propose three theoretically sound normalization methods derived from the Cauchy‐Schwarz inequality. These approaches (i) interpret the index as a genuine correlation coefficient, (ii) measure the correlation between values and neighbourhood means and (iii) incorporate weighted spatial operators. All three methods provably constrain the index to while maintaining a clear spatial interpretation of a correlation coefficient. An empirical example using the meuse dataset confirms the theoretical results and shows that the traditional Moran index may fail to attain its theoretical upper or lower bound even when observations and neighbourhood means are perfectly correlated. We therefore recommend using a Pearson correlation coefficient between observed values and neighbourhood averages. Finally, we show how to test the hypothesis of no spatial autocorrelation using this new index.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Statistical Review
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.70067
Primary Topic
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Revisiting the Normalization of the Moran's I Index: A Correlation‐Based Approach With Inference

Yves Tillé, Maria Michela Dickson, Diego Giuliani, Giuseppe Espa
International Statistical Review
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
article

Revisiting the Normalization of the Moran's I Index: A Correlation‐Based Approach With Inference

Yves Tillé, Maria Michela Dickson, Diego Giuliani, Giuseppe Espa
article en

Abstract

Summary Moran's index, the canonical measure of spatial autocorrelation, may take values outside the interval when arbitrary spatial weight matrices are used. This lack of boundedness complicates interpretation and may lead to misleading conclusions. We systematically evaluate seven approaches aimed at addressing this issue. We first examine conventional rescaling methods based on extreme eigenvalues and show their limitations. We then demonstrate that standard row‐normalizations of the weight matrix do not guarantee the desired bounds. Next, we propose three theoretically sound normalization methods derived from the Cauchy‐Schwarz inequality. These approaches (i) interpret the index as a genuine correlation coefficient, (ii) measure the correlation between values and neighbourhood means and (iii) incorporate weighted spatial operators. All three methods provably constrain the index to while maintaining a clear spatial interpretation of a correlation coefficient. An empirical example using the meuse dataset confirms the theoretical results and shows that the traditional Moran index may fail to attain its theoretical upper or lower bound even when observations and neighbourhood means are perfectly correlated. We therefore recommend using a Pearson correlation coefficient between observed values and neighbourhood averages. Finally, we show how to test the hypothesis of no spatial autocorrelation using this new index.

International Statistical Review
University of Padua (IT), University of Trento (IT), University of Neuchâtel (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.