Mapping the evidence on seniority in health care interprofessional collaboration: A scoping review

Interprofessional collaboration is essential for effective health care delivery, yet it is often shaped by hierarchy, authority gradients, and unequal professional relationships. Seniority is a relevant but insufficiently synthesized factor influencing collaboration across health professions. This scoping review mapped evidence on seniority in health care interprofessional collaboration and examined how seniority has been conceptualized across professional and organizational contexts. The review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest. Of 759 records identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a structured charting form and analyzed through descriptive and narrative synthesis. Findings showed that seniority was reflected in five forms: hierarchical position, years of experience, senior–junior relational dynamics, power differentials, and professional dominance. Seniority was reported to be associated with communication, participation in decision-making, trust, psychological safety, and collaborative functioning. Seniority may become a barrier to equitable collaboration when linked to hierarchy, power differentials, or professional dominance. Future research should clarify the concept of seniority and evaluate strategies to reduce hierarchy-related barriers in collaborative practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Healthcare Management
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2026.2729036
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mapping the evidence on seniority in health care interprofessional collaboration: A scoping review

Didi Kurniawan, Ikhwan Amirudin, M Agung Akbar, Gusgus Ghraha Ramdhanie et al.
International Journal of Healthcare Management
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Mapping the evidence on seniority in health care interprofessional collaboration: A scoping review

Didi Kurniawan, Ikhwan Amirudin, M Agung Akbar, Gusgus Ghraha Ramdhanie, Indra Frana Jaya KK
article en

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration is essential for effective health care delivery, yet it is often shaped by hierarchy, authority gradients, and unequal professional relationships. Seniority is a relevant but insufficiently synthesized factor influencing collaboration across health professions. This scoping review mapped evidence on seniority in health care interprofessional collaboration and examined how seniority has been conceptualized across professional and organizational contexts. The review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest. Of 759 records identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a structured charting form and analyzed through descriptive and narrative synthesis. Findings showed that seniority was reflected in five forms: hierarchical position, years of experience, senior–junior relational dynamics, power differentials, and professional dominance. Seniority was reported to be associated with communication, participation in decision-making, trust, psychological safety, and collaborative functioning. Seniority may become a barrier to equitable collaboration when linked to hierarchy, power differentials, or professional dominance. Future research should clarify the concept of seniority and evaluate strategies to reduce hierarchy-related barriers in collaborative practice.

International Journal of Healthcare Management
Sriwijaya University (ID), University of Indonesia (ID), Universitas Kader Bangsa (ID), Aisyah University, Padjadjaran University (ID), Riau University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.