The scaling of motion: dynamic body acceleration declines with body mass in black-tailed prairie dogs

Dynamic body acceleration (DBA) derived from animal-borne accelerometers is widely used to infer behaviour and movement-related energetic expenditure, yet its interpretation in comparative contexts may be complicated by body size. Biomechanical scaling predicts that smaller animals and individuals may generate higher mass-specific accelerations during locomotion, but this expectation has rarely been tested within a free-ranging species. We deployed collar-mounted tri-axial accelerometers at 40 Hz on 41 free-ranging black-tailed prairie dogs ( Cynomys ludovicianus ) using a standardised attachment protocol and quantified movement intensity using smoothed vectorial dynamic body acceleration (sVeDBA). In a log-log scaling analysis in which sVeDBA was natural-log transformed at the record level before averaging within individuals, mean log-sVeDBA declined with increasing body mass ( \\(\\:b=-1.37\\) , 95% CI −2.33 to − 0.41; \\(\\:{R}^{2}=0.175\\) ). Across the observed body-mass range of 0.82–1.31 kg, fitted geometric mean sVeDBA was 47.3% lower at the maximum than at the minimum body mass, although uncertainty around this estimate was substantial (95% CI 17.3–66.4% lower). Behavioural classification informed by video-synchronised captive observations indicated that daytime resting allocation increased with body mass, whereas estimated changes in walking/foraging and running allocation were negative but uncertain. Accounting for daytime walking/foraging and running allocation attenuated the estimated mass coefficient by approximately 24%, but the negative mass–sVeDBA relationship remained evident. Behaviour-specific relationships differed among resting, walking/foraging and running, indicating that the whole-deployment pattern did not reflect a uniform scaling of locomotor acceleration. Our results provide field-based evidence that body mass can influence accelerometer-derived movement summaries within a species and highlight the importance of interpreting DBA alongside behaviour, morphology and attachment context in comparative or energetic applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Biotelemetry
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-026-00497-7
Primary Topic
Robotic Locomotion and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The scaling of motion: dynamic body acceleration declines with body mass in black-tailed prairie dogs

Hila Shamon, Jesse T. Boulerice, Rory Wilson, Itai Namir et al.
Animal Biotelemetry
Robotic Locomotion and Control
article

The scaling of motion: dynamic body acceleration declines with body mass in black-tailed prairie dogs

Hila Shamon, Jesse T. Boulerice, Rory Wilson, Itai Namir, James Redcliffe, Martyna Koziol, Emma-Jane Haley, William J. McShea, Tyler Tretten
article en

Abstract

Dynamic body acceleration (DBA) derived from animal-borne accelerometers is widely used to infer behaviour and movement-related energetic expenditure, yet its interpretation in comparative contexts may be complicated by body size. Biomechanical scaling predicts that smaller animals and individuals may generate higher mass-specific accelerations during locomotion, but this expectation has rarely been tested within a free-ranging species. We deployed collar-mounted tri-axial accelerometers at 40 Hz on 41 free-ranging black-tailed prairie dogs ( Cynomys ludovicianus ) using a standardised attachment protocol and quantified movement intensity using smoothed vectorial dynamic body acceleration (sVeDBA). In a log-log scaling analysis in which sVeDBA was natural-log transformed at the record level before averaging within individuals, mean log-sVeDBA declined with increasing body mass ( \(\:b=-1.37\) , 95% CI −2.33 to − 0.41; \(\:{R}^{2}=0.175\) ). Across the observed body-mass range of 0.82–1.31 kg, fitted geometric mean sVeDBA was 47.3% lower at the maximum than at the minimum body mass, although uncertainty around this estimate was substantial (95% CI 17.3–66.4% lower). Behavioural classification informed by video-synchronised captive observations indicated that daytime resting allocation increased with body mass, whereas estimated changes in walking/foraging and running allocation were negative but uncertain. Accounting for daytime walking/foraging and running allocation attenuated the estimated mass coefficient by approximately 24%, but the negative mass–sVeDBA relationship remained evident. Behaviour-specific relationships differed among resting, walking/foraging and running, indicating that the whole-deployment pattern did not reflect a uniform scaling of locomotor acceleration. Our results provide field-based evidence that body mass can influence accelerometer-derived movement summaries within a species and highlight the importance of interpreting DBA alongside behaviour, morphology and attachment context in comparative or energetic applications.

Animal Biotelemetry
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Montana State University (US), Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US), Duke Energy (United States) (US), Swansea University (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Robotic Locomotion and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.