Drain versus no-drain thyroidectomy: a tertiary center experience with a retrospective cohort

The necessity of routine drain placement after thyroidectomy remains a subject of debate. This study aimed to determine whether the use of a drain is necessary irrespective of etiology and whether it prevents early or late postoperative complications. This single-center retrospective cohort study included 144 patients who underwent bilateral total thyroidectomy between January 2020 and June 2025. Patients were divided into no-drain and drain groups. Drain placement was not standardized and was primarily based on surgeon preference, preoperative diagnostic suspicion, and perceived operative complexity. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, or length of hospital stay ( p = 0.497). However, drain use was significantly more frequent in patients with malignant etiology ( p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding early complications, including hematoma, seroma, wound infection, or early postoperative hypoparathyroidism ( p = 0.055). Conversely, late hypoparathyroidism was significantly more frequent in the drain group ( p = 0.001). Postoperative pain levels were significantly higher in the drain group ( p < 0.001), with the mean adjusted 24-hour VAS score being 0.92 points lower in the no-drain group (95% CI: −1.35 to − 0.50). No postoperative cervical hematoma occurred in either group. İn this retrospective, non-randomized cohort, drain placement did not reduce early postoperative complications, and the absence of cervical hematomas limits firm conclusions regarding its preventive role. Furthermore, drain use was associated with increased postoperative pain and a higher rate of late hypoparathyroidism; however, this association is likely confounded by malignancy, operative complexity, and surgeon preference. These findings support the selective omission of drains in routine cases. Future prospective studies with standardized allocation criteria are required to definitively establish any causal relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-04131-4
Primary Topic
Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Drain versus no-drain thyroidectomy: a tertiary center experience with a retrospective cohort

Nidal İflazoğlu, Tuba Atak, Özkan Balçın, Remzi Can Çakır et al.
BMC Surgery
Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
article

Drain versus no-drain thyroidectomy: a tertiary center experience with a retrospective cohort

Nidal İflazoğlu, Tuba Atak, Özkan Balçın, Remzi Can Çakır, Emil HÜSEYİNOĞLU, Gökhan Garip
article en

Abstract

The necessity of routine drain placement after thyroidectomy remains a subject of debate. This study aimed to determine whether the use of a drain is necessary irrespective of etiology and whether it prevents early or late postoperative complications. This single-center retrospective cohort study included 144 patients who underwent bilateral total thyroidectomy between January 2020 and June 2025. Patients were divided into no-drain and drain groups. Drain placement was not standardized and was primarily based on surgeon preference, preoperative diagnostic suspicion, and perceived operative complexity. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, or length of hospital stay ( p = 0.497). However, drain use was significantly more frequent in patients with malignant etiology ( p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding early complications, including hematoma, seroma, wound infection, or early postoperative hypoparathyroidism ( p = 0.055). Conversely, late hypoparathyroidism was significantly more frequent in the drain group ( p = 0.001). Postoperative pain levels were significantly higher in the drain group ( p < 0.001), with the mean adjusted 24-hour VAS score being 0.92 points lower in the no-drain group (95% CI: −1.35 to − 0.50). No postoperative cervical hematoma occurred in either group. İn this retrospective, non-randomized cohort, drain placement did not reduce early postoperative complications, and the absence of cervical hematomas limits firm conclusions regarding its preventive role. Furthermore, drain use was associated with increased postoperative pain and a higher rate of late hypoparathyroidism; however, this association is likely confounded by malignancy, operative complexity, and surgeon preference. These findings support the selective omission of drains in routine cases. Future prospective studies with standardized allocation criteria are required to definitively establish any causal relationship.

BMC Surgery
Bursa Technical University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Bursa City Hospital (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.