Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Carcinoma with High-risk Criteria: Long-term Follow-up from the German Multicenter Registry

Abstract Background and Study Aim Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for selected colorectal lesions, especially those with superficial submucosal invasion, enabling en-bloc resection and accurate histopathologic assessment. However, the management of high-risk lesions following ESD, especially regarding additional surgery versus surveillance, remains debated. This study evaluated outcomes after ESD for pT1 colorectal carcinoma, comparing surgical versus conservative management. Patients/Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included 92 patients with pT1 colorectal carcinoma treated by ESD at 14 German referral centers (January 2017–December 2020). Patients were classified as low-risk (n = 34) or high-risk (n = 58) based on histopathologic criteria. Long-term outcomes were compared between low- and high-risk patients, as well as between high-risk patients undergoing additional surgery versus conservative management. Results The overall three-year disease-free survival was 82.6%, without a significant difference between the low-risk (88.2%) and high-risk groups (79.3%; p = 0.276). Among high-risk patients, 56.9% received additional surgery and 43.1% were managed conservatively. Recurrences occurred exclusively in the high-risk group (5.2%). The R0 resection rate after ESD was higher in patients managed without additional surgery than in those who subsequently underwent surgery (76.0% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.019). Conclusion ESD is effective for curative management of selected early colorectal cancers (pT1), particularly in low-risk cases. In high-risk patients, surgery remains the standard, with no recurrences observed after additional surgery in our cohort. A substantial proportion of high-risk patients did not undergo surgery in clinical practice and showed a recurrence rate of 12% (3/25). These findings support current recommendations while reflecting real-world treatment patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2949-2685
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Carcinoma with High-risk Criteria: Long-term Follow-up from the German Multicenter Registry

Andreas Wannhoff, Anna Muzalyova, Jürgen Pohl, Andreas Probst et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Carcinoma with High-risk Criteria: Long-term Follow-up from the German Multicenter Registry

Andreas Wannhoff, Anna Muzalyova, Jürgen Pohl, Andreas Probst, Alanna Ebigbo, Ingo Steinbrück, Jörg Schirra, M Anzinger, Stefan Sulk, Dani Dakkak, Franz Ludwig Dumoulin, Siegbert Faiss, Ulrike Denzer, Sara Moser, Roland Reinehr, Hans-Peter Allgaier, Viktor Rempel, Carola Fleischmann, Helmut Messmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and Study Aim Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for selected colorectal lesions, especially those with superficial submucosal invasion, enabling en-bloc resection and accurate histopathologic assessment. However, the management of high-risk lesions following ESD, especially regarding additional surgery versus surveillance, remains debated. This study evaluated outcomes after ESD for pT1 colorectal carcinoma, comparing surgical versus conservative management. Patients/Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included 92 patients with pT1 colorectal carcinoma treated by ESD at 14 German referral centers (January 2017–December 2020). Patients were classified as low-risk (n = 34) or high-risk (n = 58) based on histopathologic criteria. Long-term outcomes were compared between low- and high-risk patients, as well as between high-risk patients undergoing additional surgery versus conservative management. Results The overall three-year disease-free survival was 82.6%, without a significant difference between the low-risk (88.2%) and high-risk groups (79.3%; p = 0.276). Among high-risk patients, 56.9% received additional surgery and 43.1% were managed conservatively. Recurrences occurred exclusively in the high-risk group (5.2%). The R0 resection rate after ESD was higher in patients managed without additional surgery than in those who subsequently underwent surgery (76.0% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.019). Conclusion ESD is effective for curative management of selected early colorectal cancers (pT1), particularly in low-risk cases. In high-risk patients, surgery remains the standard, with no recurrences observed after additional surgery in our cohort. A substantial proportion of high-risk patients did not undergo surgery in clinical practice and showed a recurrence rate of 12% (3/25). These findings support current recommendations while reflecting real-world treatment patterns.

Endoscopy International OpenVol. 14(CP)
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), Asklepios Klinik Altona (DE), Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen (DE), Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg (DE), Nuremberg Hospital (DE), St. Josefs Hospital (DE), Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder (DE), Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe (DE), Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude (DE), St. Josef-Hospital (DE), Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus (DE), Klinikum Ludwigsburg (DE), Asklepios Klinik Barmbek (DE), St. Anna Hospital (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.