Discharge‐Driven Turbo Formation Stabilizes Cathode–Electrolyte Interfaces in Sulfide All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Formation protocols dictate the nascent cathode–electrolyte interphase (CEI) and therefore the attainable energy density and lifetime of sulfide‐based all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs). Yet, in contrast to liquid‐electrolyte systems, the electro‐chemo pathways activated during formation in ASSBs remain poorly defined and are rarely optimized with mechanistic intent. Herein, the formation protocol is positioned as an independent design variable that programs CEI passivation and establishes effective ion and electron transport pathways. Five distinct formation protocols are systematically evaluated to connect the initial cycling behavior with long‐term cycling performance. A conventional constant voltage holding during the initial charge fails to passivate the CEI, leading to continued resistance buildup. Counterintuitively, elevated and dynamically modulated charge/discharge rates (C‐rates) enable rapid and uniform CEI passivation. Most notably, turbo schedules that impose controlled high discharge current densities stabilize interfacial resistance and deliver durable cycling performance with substantially shortened formation time. Direct current internal resistance (DCIR) and average voltage evolution provide direct, operando‐accessible descriptors of formation quality, generating a data stream readily usable for future AI‐assisted, closed‐loop protocol optimization. These results redefine formation from a manufacturing afterthought to a scalable strategy for engineering stable cathode interfaces in next‐generation solid‐state batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & environment materials
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.70433
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Discharge‐Driven Turbo Formation Stabilizes Cathode–Electrolyte Interfaces in Sulfide All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Chanho Kim, Harry M. Meyer, Guang Yang, Thomas A. Zawodzinski et al.
Energy & environment materials
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Discharge‐Driven Turbo Formation Stabilizes Cathode–Electrolyte Interfaces in Sulfide All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Chanho Kim, Harry M. Meyer, Guang Yang, Thomas A. Zawodzinski, Jianlin Li, Yuanshun Li, Justin G. Connell, Inyoung Jang, Wenda Wu
article en

Abstract

Formation protocols dictate the nascent cathode–electrolyte interphase (CEI) and therefore the attainable energy density and lifetime of sulfide‐based all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs). Yet, in contrast to liquid‐electrolyte systems, the electro‐chemo pathways activated during formation in ASSBs remain poorly defined and are rarely optimized with mechanistic intent. Herein, the formation protocol is positioned as an independent design variable that programs CEI passivation and establishes effective ion and electron transport pathways. Five distinct formation protocols are systematically evaluated to connect the initial cycling behavior with long‐term cycling performance. A conventional constant voltage holding during the initial charge fails to passivate the CEI, leading to continued resistance buildup. Counterintuitively, elevated and dynamically modulated charge/discharge rates (C‐rates) enable rapid and uniform CEI passivation. Most notably, turbo schedules that impose controlled high discharge current densities stabilize interfacial resistance and deliver durable cycling performance with substantially shortened formation time. Direct current internal resistance (DCIR) and average voltage evolution provide direct, operando‐accessible descriptors of formation quality, generating a data stream readily usable for future AI‐assisted, closed‐loop protocol optimization. These results redefine formation from a manufacturing afterthought to a scalable strategy for engineering stable cathode interfaces in next‐generation solid‐state batteries.

Energy & environment materials
Argonne National Laboratory (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Knoxville College (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Vehicle Technologies Office
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.