Peer Support Workers to Improve Emergency Department Care Completion Among Patients Who Use Substances: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives Assess feasibility of a randomized trial and the hypothesis that emergency department (ED) Peer support workers (Peers), who share personal lived experiences and resources, may decrease ED patients with substance use who leave before treatment completion (LBTC). Specific objectives included assessing operational feasibility, estimating recruitment rates, and seeking preliminary evidence of benefit to support the definitive trial. Methods Pragmatic, open-label pilot randomized trial over the initial 15 weeks of an ED Peer program. Shifts randomized 2:1 to Peer support or usual care. We analyzed patients aged 18-75 years with the 3 most common substance use-related presenting complaints: (1) localized swelling/redness, (2) withdrawal, and (3) substance misuse/intoxication. Feasibility outcomes were patient acceptance and recruitment rate. The primary measure was LBTC (shift level and patient level). Exploratory analyses evaluated naloxone kits and 48-hour ED revisits. Results There were 72 intervention shifts (391 visits) and 37 control shifts (198 visits). Patients had a median age of 44 (IQR 35-54); 71.3% were male. Feasibility A total of 94.9% of patients accepted Peer support. The mean recruitment rate was 30 patient visits per week. LBTC Mean LBTC was 17.0% (SD 18.3%) among Peer shifts, and 23.1% (SD 22.8%) among control shifts, a difference of −6.1% (95% CI −14.6%, 2.4%). The Peer modestly impacted patient-level LBTC (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.46, 1.32]). Among patients with substance misuse/intoxication or withdrawal, the Peer decreased odds of LBTC (21.4% vs 26.9%; OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.18, 0.84]). Exploratory Peer interaction increased odds of receiving a naloxone kit (OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.34, 4.04]) and decreased 48-hour ED return visits (OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.22, 0.95]). Conclusion An ED Peer may decrease LBTC among patients who use substances. A randomized trial is feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100511
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Peer Support Workers to Improve Emergency Department Care Completion Among Patients Who Use Substances: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Qixin Liu, Hubert Wong, Lori Quinn, Jessica Moe et al.
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Peer Support Workers to Improve Emergency Department Care Completion Among Patients Who Use Substances: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Qixin Liu, Hubert Wong, Lori Quinn, Jessica Moe, Jennifer Hulme, Elle (Yuequiao) Wang, Khushi Dabla, Lara Gurney, Zachary Brown, Isa Dow
article en

Abstract

Objectives Assess feasibility of a randomized trial and the hypothesis that emergency department (ED) Peer support workers (Peers), who share personal lived experiences and resources, may decrease ED patients with substance use who leave before treatment completion (LBTC). Specific objectives included assessing operational feasibility, estimating recruitment rates, and seeking preliminary evidence of benefit to support the definitive trial. Methods Pragmatic, open-label pilot randomized trial over the initial 15 weeks of an ED Peer program. Shifts randomized 2:1 to Peer support or usual care. We analyzed patients aged 18-75 years with the 3 most common substance use-related presenting complaints: (1) localized swelling/redness, (2) withdrawal, and (3) substance misuse/intoxication. Feasibility outcomes were patient acceptance and recruitment rate. The primary measure was LBTC (shift level and patient level). Exploratory analyses evaluated naloxone kits and 48-hour ED revisits. Results There were 72 intervention shifts (391 visits) and 37 control shifts (198 visits). Patients had a median age of 44 (IQR 35-54); 71.3% were male. Feasibility A total of 94.9% of patients accepted Peer support. The mean recruitment rate was 30 patient visits per week. LBTC Mean LBTC was 17.0% (SD 18.3%) among Peer shifts, and 23.1% (SD 22.8%) among control shifts, a difference of −6.1% (95% CI −14.6%, 2.4%). The Peer modestly impacted patient-level LBTC (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.46, 1.32]). Among patients with substance misuse/intoxication or withdrawal, the Peer decreased odds of LBTC (21.4% vs 26.9%; OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.18, 0.84]). Exploratory Peer interaction increased odds of receiving a naloxone kit (OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.34, 4.04]) and decreased 48-hour ED return visits (OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.22, 0.95]). Conclusion An ED Peer may decrease LBTC among patients who use substances. A randomized trial is feasible.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians OpenVol. 7(6)
University Health Network (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Toronto (CA), St. Paul's Hospital (CA), Vancouver General Hospital (CA), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA), St. Paul's Hospital (CA)
Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.