Intimate Partner Violence and Child Maltreatment Substantiation: Differential Associations Across Abuse Types Using NCANDS Data

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant caregiver risk factor in child maltreatment, yet child protective services (CPS) responses to IPV-exposed households remain inconsistent. Understanding how IPV is evaluated within CPS investigations, and which co-occurring risks influence substantiation decisions, is therefore critical for clarifying the role of child welfare systems in responding to family violence and for identifying points of intervention within this process. This study examined how IPV shapes substantiation outcomes across maltreatment types and identified risk factors within IPV-exposed households. Using the 2023 NCANDS Child File, we analyzed 1,049,876 CPS investigations across 10 states via logistic regression. IPV was identified in 8.3% of reports, with exposure significantly increasing the odds of substantiated emotional maltreatment (OR = 30.40), neglect (OR = 4.04), and physical abuse (OR = 2.34; all p < .001), though emotional maltreatment findings warrant caution given between-state heterogeneity. Within IPV-exposed households, caregiver substance use and housing instability were strong predictors of neglect and physical abuse, while financial hardship was inversely associated with emotional maltreatment (OR = 0.65). Findings highlight the need for trauma-informed CPS responses and clearer guidelines distinguishing structural hardship from caregiver-caused harm to promote more equitable child welfare interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Maltreatment
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595261488842
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Intimate Partner Violence and Child Maltreatment Substantiation: Differential Associations Across Abuse Types Using NCANDS Data

Kathryn Maguire‐Jack, Yinqi Chen, Lijian Zhao
Child Maltreatment
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Intimate Partner Violence and Child Maltreatment Substantiation: Differential Associations Across Abuse Types Using NCANDS Data

Kathryn Maguire‐Jack, Yinqi Chen, Lijian Zhao
article en

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant caregiver risk factor in child maltreatment, yet child protective services (CPS) responses to IPV-exposed households remain inconsistent. Understanding how IPV is evaluated within CPS investigations, and which co-occurring risks influence substantiation decisions, is therefore critical for clarifying the role of child welfare systems in responding to family violence and for identifying points of intervention within this process. This study examined how IPV shapes substantiation outcomes across maltreatment types and identified risk factors within IPV-exposed households. Using the 2023 NCANDS Child File, we analyzed 1,049,876 CPS investigations across 10 states via logistic regression. IPV was identified in 8.3% of reports, with exposure significantly increasing the odds of substantiated emotional maltreatment (OR = 30.40), neglect (OR = 4.04), and physical abuse (OR = 2.34; all p < .001), though emotional maltreatment findings warrant caution given between-state heterogeneity. Within IPV-exposed households, caregiver substance use and housing instability were strong predictors of neglect and physical abuse, while financial hardship was inversely associated with emotional maltreatment (OR = 0.65). Findings highlight the need for trauma-informed CPS responses and clearer guidelines distinguishing structural hardship from caregiver-caused harm to promote more equitable child welfare interventions.

Child Maltreatment
University of Michigan (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.