Intermediate Checks Between Calibrations: How to Maintain Confidence Without Recalibrating Every Time

Calibration confirms the performance of measuring equipment at a stated time, but equipment can change before its next calibration. Intermediate checks help users detect significant changes during this period. They do not replace calibration and do not normally establish a new traceability chain. Their purpose is to maintain confidence that equipment remains suitable for use. This working paper explains how intermediate checks should be selected, performed, evaluated, and documented. It discusses check standards, control limits, trends, failed checks, and the relationship with calibration intervals. Examples from medical metrology show how simple checks can reveal drift, damage, leakage, connection problems, or unstable performance. The main conclusion is that an intermediate check is useful only when it is planned, sensitive to relevant faults, compared with predefined limits, and followed by appropriate action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22835252
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Intermediate Checks Between Calibrations: How to Maintain Confidence Without Recalibrating Every Time

Hüseyin Okan Durmuş
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Intermediate Checks Between Calibrations: How to Maintain Confidence Without Recalibrating Every Time

Hüseyin Okan Durmuş
article en

Abstract

Calibration confirms the performance of measuring equipment at a stated time, but equipment can change before its next calibration. Intermediate checks help users detect significant changes during this period. They do not replace calibration and do not normally establish a new traceability chain. Their purpose is to maintain confidence that equipment remains suitable for use. This working paper explains how intermediate checks should be selected, performed, evaluated, and documented. It discusses check standards, control limits, trends, failed checks, and the relationship with calibration intervals. Examples from medical metrology show how simple checks can reveal drift, damage, leakage, connection problems, or unstable performance. The main conclusion is that an intermediate check is useful only when it is planned, sensitive to relevant faults, compared with predefined limits, and followed by appropriate action.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gebze Technical University (TR), Middle East Technical University (TR), Tübitak National Metrology Institute (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intermediate Checks Between Calibrations: How to Maintain Confidence Without Recalibrating Every Time — Hüseyin Okan Durmuş · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS