Who and when: Probation and parole officers’ decision-making surrounding the implementation of virtual supervision practices

This study explores probation and parole officers’ (PPOs) experiences implementing a virtual supervision mobile application to their existing workloads. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 PPOs from Hidalgo, Texas, and a small Northeastern State. Findings reveal little consensus regarding which clients were selected for virtual supervision or when it was used. However, PPOs often reported using virtual supervision to reduce transportation barriers, minimize disruptions to employment, and accommodate family responsibilities for their clients. Virtual supervision was also employed to encourage compliance, especially for clients with whom PPO–client rapport was already established. Interestingly, PPOs exercised considerable discretion despite the study's explicit instructions that officers employ the technology with all clients, regardless of risk level. Findings can inform future policies and training protocols as agencies continue to utilize virtual supervision practices post-pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Probation Journal
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505261487112
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who and when: Probation and parole officers’ decision-making surrounding the implementation of virtual supervision practices

Benjamin Cohn, Jill Viglione, Amelia Wiercioch
Probation Journal
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Who and when: Probation and parole officers’ decision-making surrounding the implementation of virtual supervision practices

Benjamin Cohn, Jill Viglione, Amelia Wiercioch
article en

Abstract

This study explores probation and parole officers’ (PPOs) experiences implementing a virtual supervision mobile application to their existing workloads. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 PPOs from Hidalgo, Texas, and a small Northeastern State. Findings reveal little consensus regarding which clients were selected for virtual supervision or when it was used. However, PPOs often reported using virtual supervision to reduce transportation barriers, minimize disruptions to employment, and accommodate family responsibilities for their clients. Virtual supervision was also employed to encourage compliance, especially for clients with whom PPO–client rapport was already established. Interestingly, PPOs exercised considerable discretion despite the study's explicit instructions that officers employ the technology with all clients, regardless of risk level. Findings can inform future policies and training protocols as agencies continue to utilize virtual supervision practices post-pandemic.

Probation Journal
University of Central Florida (US)
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who and when: Probation and parole officers’ decision-making surrounding the implementation of virtual supervision practices — Benjamin Cohn, Jill Viglione, et al. · Probation Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS