Evaluation of malpractice fears and defensive approaches in orthodontists’ clinical practice

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of medical malpractice litigation and associated defensive medicine practices on the clinical decision-making of orthodontists.Materials and MethodsThis study was conducted between December 2025 and February 2026. Questionnaires were emailed to 2,526 orthodontists registered in the database of the Turkish Orthodontic Society (TOD), and 252 orthodontists completed the survey. Of the participants, 64.3% (n = 162) were female and 35.7% (n = 90) were male. In addition to demographic questions, participants completed the Fear of Medical Error Scale (FMS), the Defensive Medicine Practice Attitude Scale (DMPAS), and clinical preference questions specific to orthodontic practice. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsOverall, 51.2% (n = 129) of the participants exhibited a high level of fear of medical malpractice. Orthodontists aged over 35 years had significantly lower FMS scores than younger orthodontists. According to the DMPAS, 53.6% of orthodontists exhibited a high level of defensive medicine behavior, while 15.5% exhibited a very high level.ConclusionOrthodontists’ clinical decision-making appears to be influenced by concerns about legal repercussions. To mitigate the legal pressure experienced by physicians, education in health law should be strengthened for physicians and other healthcare professionals, and medical malpractice legislation should be revised to provide a more balanced framework that also safeguards physicians’ rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Oral Research
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20261905763
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of malpractice fears and defensive approaches in orthodontists’ clinical practice

Hüseyin Melik Böyük, GÖNÜL DİNÇ
European Oral Research
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Evaluation of malpractice fears and defensive approaches in orthodontists’ clinical practice

Hüseyin Melik Böyük, GÖNÜL DİNÇ
article en

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of medical malpractice litigation and associated defensive medicine practices on the clinical decision-making of orthodontists.Materials and MethodsThis study was conducted between December 2025 and February 2026. Questionnaires were emailed to 2,526 orthodontists registered in the database of the Turkish Orthodontic Society (TOD), and 252 orthodontists completed the survey. Of the participants, 64.3% (n = 162) were female and 35.7% (n = 90) were male. In addition to demographic questions, participants completed the Fear of Medical Error Scale (FMS), the Defensive Medicine Practice Attitude Scale (DMPAS), and clinical preference questions specific to orthodontic practice. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsOverall, 51.2% (n = 129) of the participants exhibited a high level of fear of medical malpractice. Orthodontists aged over 35 years had significantly lower FMS scores than younger orthodontists. According to the DMPAS, 53.6% of orthodontists exhibited a high level of defensive medicine behavior, while 15.5% exhibited a very high level.ConclusionOrthodontists’ clinical decision-making appears to be influenced by concerns about legal repercussions. To mitigate the legal pressure experienced by physicians, education in health law should be strengthened for physicians and other healthcare professionals, and medical malpractice legislation should be revised to provide a more balanced framework that also safeguards physicians’ rights.

European Oral ResearchVol. 60(1)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.