U.S. Civic Rigor Framework (Corrected Version): A Ten‑Criterion Audit Model for Federal Election Platforms

This living paper applies the corrected U.S. Civic Rigor Framework — a ten‑criterion adaptation of the Universal Civic Rigor Checklist — to American party platforms from 1840 onward. The current release covers 1840–1864 (18 documents), spanning Democratic, Whig, Free Soil, American/Know‑Nothing, Constitutional Union, and early Republican platforms. The framework evaluates constitutional competence, fiscal scale, definitional guardrails, historical grounding, disclosure and causal honesty, committee and veto hearing, rhetorical register, legislative and administrative blueprint, federal agency provenance, and judicial review. Early findings show that only two of the earliest platforms clear the bottom grade band, with rigor rising as the sectional crisis intensifies and falling again once the Civil War begins. This project is ongoing and will expand to cover all major U.S. platforms through 2024. Full disclosure: due to the complex nature of this project, various AI models are used to help collate, verify, and structure the data. All AI prompts and hand‑off instructions have been intentionally preserved within the working papers to maintain a transparent historical log of the research process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22837612
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

U.S. Civic Rigor Framework (Corrected Version): A Ten‑Criterion Audit Model for Federal Election Platforms

Craig Kyrle Strachan Davidson
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
preprint

U.S. Civic Rigor Framework (Corrected Version): A Ten‑Criterion Audit Model for Federal Election Platforms

Craig Kyrle Strachan Davidson
preprint en

Abstract

This living paper applies the corrected U.S. Civic Rigor Framework — a ten‑criterion adaptation of the Universal Civic Rigor Checklist — to American party platforms from 1840 onward. The current release covers 1840–1864 (18 documents), spanning Democratic, Whig, Free Soil, American/Know‑Nothing, Constitutional Union, and early Republican platforms. The framework evaluates constitutional competence, fiscal scale, definitional guardrails, historical grounding, disclosure and causal honesty, committee and veto hearing, rhetorical register, legislative and administrative blueprint, federal agency provenance, and judicial review. Early findings show that only two of the earliest platforms clear the bottom grade band, with rigor rising as the sectional crisis intensifies and falling again once the Civil War begins. This project is ongoing and will expand to cover all major U.S. platforms through 2024. Full disclosure: due to the complex nature of this project, various AI models are used to help collate, verify, and structure the data. All AI prompts and hand‑off instructions have been intentionally preserved within the working papers to maintain a transparent historical log of the research process.

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

U.S. Civic Rigor Framework (Corrected Version): A Ten‑Criterion Audit Model for Federal Election Platforms — Craig Kyrle Strachan Davidson · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS