Prime-shift operators on Björner's complex of squarefree integers: an exact decomposition of the Mertens invariant, and a corrected analysis of the Toeplitz--Hankel pipeline for the Guinand--Weil explicit formula

{"Let":[0],"$\\\\Delta_{n}$":[1],"denote":[2],"Bj\\\\\\"orner's":[3],"simplicial":[4],"complex":[5],"on":[6],"the":[7,19,24,35,41,70,113,129,154,167,182,203,212,231,242,305,330,344],"squarefree":[8,171],"integers":[9],"$m\\\\leq":[10],"n$":[11],"and":[12,50,175,300,327],"let$H_{n}":[13],"=":[14,73,84,102,162,193,206,216,225,282,308],"\\\\sum_{p\\\\leq":[15],"n}c_{p}(T_{p}":[16],"+":[17,77,86,208,218,284],"T_{p}^{*})$be":[18],"self-adjoint":[20],"operator":[21],"obtained":[22],"from":[23],"prime-shift":[25],"operators":[26],"$T_{p}$":[27],"with":[28,164,249,256],"bounded":[29],"weights":[30],"$c_{p}$.":[31],"This":[32,180],"paper":[33,266],"is":[34,65,132,210,230,290,294,325,347],"fourth":[36],"revision":[37],"of":[38,48,63,137,157,233,277,304,335,343],"\\\\cite{pavesi2026v1},":[39],"superseding":[40],"first":[42],"three.":[43],"It":[44],"contains":[45],"both":[46],"corrections":[47],"errors":[49],"new":[51,275],"exact":[52,148,183],"results.":[53,149],"Corrections.":[54],"(i)":[55],"The":[56,89,108,135,279],"bipartite":[57],"block":[58],"$A:":[59],"C_{\\\\mathrm{even}}":[60],"\\\\to":[61],"C_{\\\\mathrm{odd}}$":[62],"$H_{n}$":[64,138,336],"not":[66,95,119,144,211,272],"$\\\\sum_{p\\\\nmid":[67],"m}c_{p}e_{pm}$":[68],"but":[69],"full":[71,130],"sum$Ae_{m}":[72],"\\\\sum_{p\\\\nmid":[74],"m,pm\\\\le":[75],"n}c_{p}e_{pm}":[76],"\\\\sum_{p\\\\mid":[78],"m}c_{p}e_{m/p}$,which":[79],"we":[80,328],"write":[81],"as":[82,337],"$A":[83],"A_{\\\\uparrow}":[85],"A_{\\\\downarrow}$.":[87],"(ii)":[88],"maximal":[90,155],"elements":[91,156],"span":[92],"$\\\\ker":[93,96,100],"A_{\\\\uparrow}$,":[94],"A$;":[97],"in":[98,112,241,260,296,321],"fact":[99],"A":[101],"\\\\{0\\\\}$":[103],"for":[104,245],"$n\\\\ge":[105],"2$.":[106],"(iii)":[107],"values":[109],"$c_{*}$":[110],"reported":[111],"earlier":[114],"revisions":[115],"correspond":[116],"to":[117,120,173],"$A_{\\\\uparrow}$,":[118],"$A$;":[121],"at":[122],"$n=10^{4}$,":[123],"$\\\\operatorname{rank}(A_{\\\\uparrow})=1125$,":[124],"$\\\\operatorname{rank}(A)=2141$,":[125],"so":[126],"$c_{*}=0.185$":[127],"while":[128],"density":[131,141],"$c=0.352$.":[133],"(iv)":[134],"kernel":[136],"therefore":[139],"has":[140],"$1-2c\\\\approx":[142],"0.296$,":[143],"$1-2c_{*}\\\\approx":[145],"0.630$.":[146],"New":[147],"(v)":[150],"We":[151,201,236,270,319],"prove":[152,202],"that":[153],"$[1,n]$":[158],"are":[159],"exactly":[160],"$m":[161],"P_{k}m'$":[163],"$P_{k}=p_{1}\\\\cdots":[165],"p_{k}$":[166],"$k$-th":[168],"primorial,":[169],"$m'$":[170],"coprime":[172],"$P_{k}$,":[174],"$m'":[176],"\\\\in":[177],"(n/(p_{k+1}P_{k}),\\\\,":[178],"n/(p_{k}P_{k})]$.":[179],"yields":[181],"formula\\\\[":[184],"M_{\\\\mathcal{M}}(n)":[185,207,217,283],"\\\\;=\\\\;":[186],"\\\\sum_{k\\\\ge":[187],"0}(-1)^{k}\\\\Bigl[T_{k}\\\\!\\\\Big(\\\\Big\\\\lfloor\\\\tfrac{n}{p_{k}P_{k}}\\\\Big\\\\rfloor\\\\Big)":[188],"-":[189,221,287],"T_{k}\\\\!\\\\Big(\\\\Big\\\\lfloor\\\\tfrac{n}{p_{k+1}P_{k}}\\\\Big\\\\rfloor\\\\Big)\\\\Bigr],":[190],"\\\\qquad":[191],"T_{k}(X)":[192],"\\\\sum_{\\\\substack{d\\\\le":[194],"X\\\\\\\\":[195],"d":[196],"\\\\text{":[197],"}":[198],"P_{k}\\\\text{-smooth}}}M(\\\\lfloor":[199],"X/d\\\\rfloor).\\\\](vi)":[200],"identity":[204],"$M(n)":[205,281],"M_{\\\\mathcal{M}}^{T}(n)$":[209],"correct":[213],"decomposition;":[214],"instead$M(n)":[215],"\\\\dim":[219,222,288],"R_{n}^{\\\\uparrow}":[220,286],"R_{n}^{\\\\uparrow,T}$,where":[223],"$R_{n}^{\\\\uparrow}":[224],"\\\\ker":[226],"A_{\\\\uparrow}|_{C_{\\\\mathrm{even}}}":[227],"\\\\ominus":[228],"\\\\mathcal{M}$":[229],"residual":[232],"relations.":[234],"(vii)":[235],"observe":[237],"numerically":[238],"that$|M_{\\\\mathcal{M}}(n)|/\\\\sqrt{n}$":[239],"oscillates":[240],"range":[243],"$[0.05,0.40]$":[244],"$n\\\\le":[246],"2\\\\times":[247],"10^{5}$,":[248],"typical":[250],"value":[251],"near":[252],"$0.29\\\\approx":[253],"1-1/\\\\sqrt{2}$,":[254],"consistent":[255],"$M_{\\\\mathcal{M}}(n)":[257,307],"\\\\sim":[258],"(1-1/\\\\sqrt{2})\\\\sqrt{n}$":[259],"RMS":[261,297],"under":[262,298],"RH.":[263,278],"\\\\textbf{What":[264],"this":[265,324],"does":[267],"\\\\emph{not}":[268],"do.}":[269],"do":[271],"obtain":[273],"a":[274],"characterisation":[276],"decomposition":[280],"(\\\\dim":[285],"R_{n}^{\\\\uparrow,T})$":[289],"algebraic:":[291],"every":[292],"term":[293],"$\\\\Theta(\\\\sqrt{n})$":[295],"RH,":[299],"any":[301],"unconditional":[302],"bound":[303],"form":[306],"O(\\\\sqrt{n})$":[309],"would":[310],"already":[311],"imply":[312],"RH":[313],"by":[314],"telescoping":[315],"over":[316],"dyadic":[317],"intervals.":[318],"explain":[320],"Sref{sec:no-new-char}":[322],"why":[323],"unavoidable,":[326],"formulate":[329],"spectral":[331],"modification":[332],"$\\\\tilde":[333],"H_{n}$":[334],"an":[338],"open":[339],"conjecture.":[340],"No":[341],"proof":[342],"Riemann":[345],"Hypothesis":[346],"claimed.":[348]}

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22823015
Primary Topic
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Prime-shift operators on Björner's complex of squarefree integers: an exact decomposition of the Mertens invariant, and a corrected analysis of the Toeplitz--Hankel pipeline for the Guinand--Weil explicit formula

Luca Eliseo Pavesi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
preprint

Prime-shift operators on Björner's complex of squarefree integers: an exact decomposition of the Mertens invariant, and a corrected analysis of the Toeplitz--Hankel pipeline for the Guinand--Weil explicit formula

Luca Eliseo Pavesi
preprint en

Abstract

Let $\Delta_{n}$ denote Bj\"orner's simplicial complex on the squarefree integers $m\leq n$ and let$H_{n} = \sum_{p\leq n}c_{p}(T_{p} + T_{p}^{*})$be the self-adjoint operator obtained from the prime-shift operators $T_{p}$ with bounded weights $c_{p}$. This paper is the fourth revision of \cite{pavesi2026v1}, superseding the first three. It contains both corrections of errors and new exact results. Corrections. (i) The bipartite block $A: C_{\mathrm{even}} \to C_{\mathrm{odd}}$ of $H_{n}$ is not $\sum_{p\nmid m}c_{p}e_{pm}$ but the full sum$Ae_{m} = \sum_{p\nmid m,pm\le n}c_{p}e_{pm} + \sum_{p\mid m}c_{p}e_{m/p}$,which we write as $A = A_{\uparrow} + A_{\downarrow}$. (ii) The maximal elements span $\ker A_{\uparrow}$, not $\ker A$; in fact $\ker A = \{0\}$ for $n\ge 2$. (iii) The values $c_{*}$ reported in the earlier revisions correspond to $A_{\uparrow}$, not to $A$; at $n=10^{4}$, $\operatorname{rank}(A_{\uparrow})=1125$, $\operatorname{rank}(A)=2141$, so $c_{*}=0.185$ while the full density is $c=0.352$. (iv) The kernel of $H_{n}$ therefore has density $1-2c\approx 0.296$, not $1-2c_{*}\approx 0.630$. New exact results. (v) We prove that the maximal elements of $[1,n]$ are exactly $m = P_{k}m'$ with $P_{k}=p_{1}\cdots p_{k}$ the $k$-th primorial, $m'$ squarefree coprime to $P_{k}$, and $m' \in (n/(p_{k+1}P_{k}),\, n/(p_{k}P_{k})]$. This yields the exact formula\[ M_{\mathcal{M}}(n) \;=\; \sum_{k\ge 0}(-1)^{k}\Bigl[T_{k}\!\Big(\Big\lfloor\tfrac{n}{p_{k}P_{k}}\Big\rfloor\Big) - T_{k}\!\Big(\Big\lfloor\tfrac{n}{p_{k+1}P_{k}}\Big\rfloor\Big)\Bigr], \qquad T_{k}(X) = \sum_{\substack{d\le X\\ d \text{ } P_{k}\text{-smooth}}}M(\lfloor X/d\rfloor).\](vi) We prove the identity $M(n) = M_{\mathcal{M}}(n) + M_{\mathcal{M}}^{T}(n)$ is not the correct decomposition; instead$M(n) = M_{\mathcal{M}}(n) + \dim R_{n}^{\uparrow} - \dim R_{n}^{\uparrow,T}$,where $R_{n}^{\uparrow} = \ker A_{\uparrow}|_{C_{\mathrm{even}}} \ominus \mathcal{M}$ is the residual of relations. (vii) We observe numerically that$|M_{\mathcal{M}}(n)|/\sqrt{n}$ oscillates in the range $[0.05,0.40]$ for $n\le 2\times 10^{5}$, with typical value near $0.29\approx 1-1/\sqrt{2}$, consistent with $M_{\mathcal{M}}(n) \sim (1-1/\sqrt{2})\sqrt{n}$ in RMS under RH. \textbf{What this paper does \emph{not} do.} We do not obtain a new characterisation of RH. The decomposition $M(n) = M_{\mathcal{M}}(n) + (\dim R_{n}^{\uparrow} - \dim R_{n}^{\uparrow,T})$ is algebraic: every term is $\Theta(\sqrt{n})$ in RMS under RH, and any unconditional bound of the form $M_{\mathcal{M}}(n) = O(\sqrt{n})$ would already imply RH by telescoping over dyadic intervals. We explain in Sref{sec:no-new-char} why this is unavoidable, and we formulate the spectral modification $\tilde H_{n}$ of $H_{n}$ as an open conjecture. No proof of the Riemann Hypothesis is claimed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.