Commitment to farming persists amid declining farmer satisfaction

Researchers have increasingly documented associations between agricultural stress and poorer farmer satisfaction and well-being. However, less attention has been paid to how agricultural stress relates to other responses, including commitment to continuing in agriculture and livelihood adjustments. Using 2025 pilot data from the Alabama Farm Poll, we examine associations between economic, production, policy, and social stressors and farmer satisfaction, commitment to farming, and livelihood adjustments. Linear regression models show that stressors across all four dimensions were consistently associated with lower farmer satisfaction, with social stressors exhibiting comparatively greater relationships across models. In contrast, associations between stress and commitment to farming were weaker and less consistent. Farmers also reported a range of livelihood adjustments, including postponing investments, reducing expenditures, increasing off-farm work, and modifying household consumption patterns. These findings indicate that declines in farmer satisfaction do not necessarily correspond to proportional declines in commitment to remaining in agriculture and that farming households often manage stress through ongoing livelihood accommodations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104415
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Commitment to farming persists amid declining farmer satisfaction

Kelli J. Russell, Jean R. Francois, Mykel R. Taylor
Journal of Rural Studies
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Commitment to farming persists amid declining farmer satisfaction

Kelli J. Russell, Jean R. Francois, Mykel R. Taylor
article en

Abstract

Researchers have increasingly documented associations between agricultural stress and poorer farmer satisfaction and well-being. However, less attention has been paid to how agricultural stress relates to other responses, including commitment to continuing in agriculture and livelihood adjustments. Using 2025 pilot data from the Alabama Farm Poll, we examine associations between economic, production, policy, and social stressors and farmer satisfaction, commitment to farming, and livelihood adjustments. Linear regression models show that stressors across all four dimensions were consistently associated with lower farmer satisfaction, with social stressors exhibiting comparatively greater relationships across models. In contrast, associations between stress and commitment to farming were weaker and less consistent. Farmers also reported a range of livelihood adjustments, including postponing investments, reducing expenditures, increasing off-farm work, and modifying household consumption patterns. These findings indicate that declines in farmer satisfaction do not necessarily correspond to proportional declines in commitment to remaining in agriculture and that farming households often manage stress through ongoing livelihood accommodations.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 128
Auburn University (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.