Haloperidol for Hypoactive and Hyperactive Delirium in ICU Patients—A Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of the AID ‐ ICU Trial

BACKGROUND: Delirium is clinically classified into hypoactive or hyperactive motoric subtypes, which may have different responses to treatment. We assessed heterogeneity in treatment effects according to baseline motoric subtype in the AID-ICU trial, which randomised adult ICU patients with delirium to haloperidol versus placebo. METHODS: In this post hoc study of the AID-ICU trial, we used adjusted Bayesian linear and logistic regression models to assess potential differential effects of haloperidol on 90-day outcomes according to motor subtypes. Effect estimates are reported as absolute differences within and between subtypes (mean differences (MD)/risk differences (RD) and differences in MDs/RDs), with probabilities of any benefit, any harm and differential effects between subtypes. RESULTS: Of 987 participants, 540 (54.7%) had hypoactive and 447 (45.3%) had hyperactive delirium at randomisation. Haloperidol was associated with more days alive out of hospital in both subgroups, with a 76.5% probability of a larger intervention effect in those with hyperactive delirium (difference in MDs 2.9 days; 95% CrI -4.8 to 10.6). Similar results were obtained for days alive without delirium/coma and days alive without mechanical ventilation. Haloperidol was associated with lower mortality in both subgroups, with a 73% probability of larger benefit in hyperactive delirium (difference in RDs -3.7%-points; 95% CrI -15.3 to 7.8). We found no relevant differences in serious adverse reactions or use of rescue medications. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with moderate probabilities of greater effects in hyperactive delirium. Further research is warranted to confirm these results. EDITORIAL COMMENT: In this post hoc analysis of the AID-ICU trial, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with a tendency towards greater treatment effects in hyperactive delirium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03392376; EudraCT number, 2017-003829-15.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70336
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Haloperidol for Hypoactive and Hyperactive Delirium in ICU Patients—A Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of the AID ‐ ICU Trial

Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Johanna Hästbacka, Stine Estrup, Trine Sommer et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Haloperidol for Hypoactive and Hyperactive Delirium in ICU Patients—A Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of the AID ‐ ICU Trial

Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Johanna Hästbacka, Stine Estrup, Trine Sommer, Louise Gramstrup Nielsen, Helle Scharling Pedersen, Ole Mathiesen, Anne Sofie Andreasen, Morten H. Bestle, Matt Morgan, Nina Christine Andersen‐Ranberg, Camilla Bekker Mortensen, Anders Granholm, Troels B. Jensen, Sven‐Olaf Weber, Giuseppe Citerio, Marie Oxenbøll Collet, Nilanjan Dey, Bülent Uslu, Kjeld Damgaard, Anders Perner
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delirium is clinically classified into hypoactive or hyperactive motoric subtypes, which may have different responses to treatment. We assessed heterogeneity in treatment effects according to baseline motoric subtype in the AID-ICU trial, which randomised adult ICU patients with delirium to haloperidol versus placebo. METHODS: In this post hoc study of the AID-ICU trial, we used adjusted Bayesian linear and logistic regression models to assess potential differential effects of haloperidol on 90-day outcomes according to motor subtypes. Effect estimates are reported as absolute differences within and between subtypes (mean differences (MD)/risk differences (RD) and differences in MDs/RDs), with probabilities of any benefit, any harm and differential effects between subtypes. RESULTS: Of 987 participants, 540 (54.7%) had hypoactive and 447 (45.3%) had hyperactive delirium at randomisation. Haloperidol was associated with more days alive out of hospital in both subgroups, with a 76.5% probability of a larger intervention effect in those with hyperactive delirium (difference in MDs 2.9 days; 95% CrI -4.8 to 10.6). Similar results were obtained for days alive without delirium/coma and days alive without mechanical ventilation. Haloperidol was associated with lower mortality in both subgroups, with a 73% probability of larger benefit in hyperactive delirium (difference in RDs -3.7%-points; 95% CrI -15.3 to 7.8). We found no relevant differences in serious adverse reactions or use of rescue medications. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with moderate probabilities of greater effects in hyperactive delirium. Further research is warranted to confirm these results. EDITORIAL COMMENT: In this post hoc analysis of the AID-ICU trial, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with a tendency towards greater treatment effects in hyperactive delirium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03392376; EudraCT number, 2017-003829-15.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(9)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), University Hospital of Wales (GB), Odense University Hospital (DK), Herlev Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT), Centre for Research in Intensive Care (DK), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI), Sjællands Universitetshospital, Nykøbing F. (DK), Sygehus Sønderjylland (DK), Zealand University Hospital Køge (DK), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Innovation Fund
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.