Quantifying Meaningful Information in Incorrect Naming Responses Following Strategic Word Retrieval Treatment in Primary Progressive Aphasia

Purpose: Anomia is a core feature of both logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). Naming interventions targeting self-cueing in persons with lvPPA and svPPA have been shown to promote generalized improvement in word finding. However, studies have typically characterized response to treatment using binary scoring of naming attempts. There is no established method for evaluating how well people with aphasia communicate meaningful lexical and semantic information for items that they are unable to name. The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in communicative value of Boston Naming Test (BNT) error responses for individuals with lvPPA and svPPA following a strategy-based naming treatment. Method: Using a novel scoring procedure, the meaningful information score (MIS), we quantified the amount of meaningful information shared on incorrectly named or unnamed items from the BNT before and after a strategy-based naming treatment administered to persons with lvPPA ( n = 20) and svPPA ( n = 14). We analyzed change in BNT naming accuracy with a linear mixed-effects model and change in MIS score using a negative binomial mixed-effects model. Individual change was tested with a bootstrapping analysis. Results: At the group level, BNT accuracy did not significantly change from pre- to posttreatment. However, participants showed a significant increase at posttreatment in the amount of meaningful information provided for items not correctly named as measured by the MIS ( p = .002). The majority of individuals showed change in the positive direction on the MIS, with 13 of 34 showing statistically significant improvement. Conclusions: The MIS is a promising tool for capturing gains in functional communication following naming treatment. Findings also indicate that strategy-based naming treatment can increase the meaningful information conveyed during naming attempts, even in the context of progressive language decline. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34515681

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_jslhr-26-00132
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Meaningful Information in Incorrect Naming Responses Following Strategic Word Retrieval Treatment in Primary Progressive Aphasia

Heather Raye Dial, Maria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini, Stephanie M. Grasso, Kindle Rising et al.
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Quantifying Meaningful Information in Incorrect Naming Responses Following Strategic Word Retrieval Treatment in Primary Progressive Aphasia

Heather Raye Dial, Maria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini, Stephanie M. Grasso, Kindle Rising, Lisa Wauters, Gary Robinaugh, Kristin M. Schaffer, Rachel Tessmer, Eduardo Europa, Maya L. Henry, Pélagie M. Beeson, Carly Millanski, Honey Isabel Hubbard, J. Gregory Hixon
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Anomia is a core feature of both logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). Naming interventions targeting self-cueing in persons with lvPPA and svPPA have been shown to promote generalized improvement in word finding. However, studies have typically characterized response to treatment using binary scoring of naming attempts. There is no established method for evaluating how well people with aphasia communicate meaningful lexical and semantic information for items that they are unable to name. The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in communicative value of Boston Naming Test (BNT) error responses for individuals with lvPPA and svPPA following a strategy-based naming treatment. Method: Using a novel scoring procedure, the meaningful information score (MIS), we quantified the amount of meaningful information shared on incorrectly named or unnamed items from the BNT before and after a strategy-based naming treatment administered to persons with lvPPA ( n = 20) and svPPA ( n = 14). We analyzed change in BNT naming accuracy with a linear mixed-effects model and change in MIS score using a negative binomial mixed-effects model. Individual change was tested with a bootstrapping analysis. Results: At the group level, BNT accuracy did not significantly change from pre- to posttreatment. However, participants showed a significant increase at posttreatment in the amount of meaningful information provided for items not correctly named as measured by the MIS ( p = .002). The majority of individuals showed change in the positive direction on the MIS, with 13 of 34 showing statistically significant improvement. Conclusions: The MIS is a promising tool for capturing gains in functional communication following naming treatment. Findings also indicate that strategy-based naming treatment can increase the meaningful information conveyed during naming attempts, even in the context of progressive language decline. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34515681

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
University of Arizona (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US), University of Houston (US), San Jose State University (US), University of Northern Colorado (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Michigan State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon